My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 134 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. <br /> a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> quality of the environment,substantially reduce the <br /> habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or <br /> wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining <br /> levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal <br /> community,reduce the number or restrict the range <br /> of a rare or endangered plant or animal,or <br /> eliminate important examples of the major periods <br /> of California history or prehistory? <br /> b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> limited,but cumulatively considerable? <br /> ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the <br /> incremental effects of a project are considerable <br /> when viewed in connection with the effects of past <br /> projects,the effects of other current projects,and <br /> the effects of probable future projects.) <br /> c) Does the project have environmental effects which ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> will cause substantial adverse effects on human <br /> beings,either directly or indirectly? <br /> a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially <br /> reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below <br /> self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or <br /> restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of <br /> the major periods of California history or prehistory?(Potentially Significant Unless <br /> Mitigation Incorporated) <br /> Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would ensure that potential impacts associated with <br /> the release of hazardous materials,which could in turn degrade the quality of the environment,would <br /> be reduced to a less-than-significant level. Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through <br /> CUL-2 would ensure that potential impacts to cultural resources that could be uncovered during <br /> construction activities would be reduced to a less-than-significant level.No impacts to biological <br /> resources were identified for the proposed project. Therefore,with the incorporation of mitigation <br /> measures,development of the proposed project would not: 1)degrade the quality of the environment; <br /> 2) substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; 3)cause a fish or wildlife species <br /> population to drop below self-sustaining levels; 4)threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; <br /> 5)reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or 6)eliminate <br /> important examples of the major periods of California history. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Sch-I\PRODUCrSUS-MND1Public\Ra ketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx(09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 110 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 118 of 124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.