My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 204 <br /> the adjacent high voltage electrical lines along Charter Street and the rear wall high <br /> voltage transformer present immediate concerns. Finally,the highly confined building <br /> and site would deprive school children of play area, safe outside emergency gathering <br /> area, and for the most part even windows to look out of. Aside from local and state <br /> standards, this condition in my opinion is an unacceptable environment for children to be <br /> subjected to. The result would be a substandard school facility in many respects. <br /> In my opinion, this elementary school would be unsafe and inappropriate for the <br /> proposed site and building. The site is far too small to accommodate a standard school <br /> facility and the industrial neighborhood is far too dangerous for children. An elementary <br /> school would be incompatible with the surrounding industrial uses and vice-versa. The <br /> primary purpose of zoning is to prevent this kind of incompatible use condition from <br /> happening. The school would also result in numerous significant environmental impacts <br /> (some of which are identified above)for which no mitigation is reasonably obtainable. I <br /> do not feel the applicable CEQA, land use permit,variance or rezoning findings can be <br /> met for this proposed Project. As a result, I feel the City and County would be strapped <br /> with long-term safety,public animosity and legal issues if the Project were to be <br /> approved and developed. It is therefore my opinion that the Project should be denied. <br /> Should the City choose to continue review of the proposed Project, I feel that an <br /> Environmental Impact Report would be imperative to address the many very real impacts <br /> posed by the Project, and that mitigations be prepared for as many of the significant <br /> impacts as possible. Public health and safety impacts would be of primary concern. The <br /> proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is a wholly insufficient document to address the <br /> numerous potentially significant impacts posed by the project. Regional, state and <br /> federal agencies would also need to become an integral part of the review process. In <br /> addition,it is quite clear by the current analysis that numerous significant impacts would <br /> not be able to be mitigated,therefore,a Statement of Overriding Circumstances would be <br /> necessary to address health and safety impacts that cannot be mitigated to a point of <br /> insignificance. <br /> Sincerely, ip <br /> Way?e P. Rasmussen,President <br /> Rasmussen Planning, Inc. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.