My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
...� nevi FANNER, INC. <br /> 7.A. - Page 210 1 Building& Landscape Contractor ` <br /> 3046 Woodside Road <br /> Woodside, CA 94062 <br /> Phone 650.851.4915 <br /> 1 Fax 650.851.5458 <br /> dave,Pdavetannerbuilds.com <br /> City of Redwood City June 16, 2017 <br /> 1017 Middlefield Road <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> Re: launchpad Development / Rocketship School <br /> Dear Planning Commissioners, <br /> We are here again on the continued meeting of April 4, 2017. Before <br /> the last meeting, I submitted 2 independent studies from Rasmussen <br /> Planning Inc. & Prism Engineering, hired by the Redwood Village BA. You <br /> continued this meeting to a later date, so that your staff could study what <br /> they have found and reported on. There are questions and statements that <br /> needed to be answered per CEQA. <br /> I've attached to this E-mail transmittal (please read their responses) <br /> to your staffs' and Rocketship's consultants inability to answer the very <br /> pressing questions, does this school fit into this location safely? <br /> The answer is obviously, NO! <br /> 1) A school for small children of age's five to eleven-year olds, in this <br /> high intensity industrial neighborhood would be highly unsafe. <br /> 2) Student drop-offs in the morning would create a significant adverse <br /> traffic impact on the neighboring industrial businesses because of queuing <br /> onto surrounding streets, over a mile long of idling cars. <br /> 3) Inadequate parking would pose significant impacts for the site and <br /> neighboring street system when the school has parent gatherings & <br /> meetings and forums. <br /> 4) Walking and biking to school would be prohibitive due to the unsafe <br /> nature of the high volumes of auto and truck traffic on surrounding streets. <br /> Also, who in their right mind would let a 5 to 11-year-old child ride their bike <br /> in an industrial area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.