Laserfiche WebLink
TA. - Page 212 <br /> P. 1 <br /> 1 <br /> mow _ <br /> I <br /> C � F :,PR.I <br /> ENGINEERING , <br /> June 16, 2017 <br /> Dave Tanner <br /> Dave Tanner, Inc. <br /> 3046 Woodside Road <br /> Woodside, CA 94062 <br /> RE: Response to Comments on PRISM Engineering Traffic Study Review of Rocketship <br /> Charter School Application <br /> Dear Dave, <br /> PRISM Engineering has reviewed the comments made by the project applicant's traffic engineer <br /> pertaining to our comments on their report. In general, their comments pertaining to our review <br /> did not adequately address the concerns we raised, and in some cases, did not address them at <br /> all. In the pages that follow we summarize some of this with specific examples. It is o ur position <br /> that the traffic study is deficient and does not adequately address level of service concerns (as <br /> per County and Caltrans standards), ignores safety issues pertaining to veryyoung children(ages <br /> 5-11)walking in an industrial zoned area shared with frequent trucks (The school is proposed for <br /> a non-residential zoned area), etc. <br /> Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> PRISM Engineering <br /> -11 <br /> Grant Johnson, TE <br /> Principal <br /> 1. PRISM Engineering original statement: '?here is actually an observable LOS F condition at the <br /> Woodside and Bay Road intersection during the am peak hour because of blockage of traffic backing <br /> up from the US 101 interchange. This results in the northbound traffic on Woodside having a stop <br /> and go condition. Traffic does not freely flow through this intersection. I observed in the field while <br /> counting the traffic at Woodside and Bay that the northbound approach was at LOS F conditions <br /> because of this,and that the northbound approach was 42%of the total traffic at this intersection." <br /> JEW I <br /> It <br /> -,� AV„�PR1 Rt1YG www,prism.engineering <br />