Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The Effects of a $15 Minimum Wage by 2019 in Santa Clara County and San Jose 41 <br /> <br />This estimate is compatible with, but somewhat larger than, price elasticities estimated from <br />aggregate panel data. Hall (2009), for example, obtains a price elasticity of -0.50. On the other <br />hand, our estimate is very close to that of Blundell et al. (1993). <br />5.3 Income effects <br />We consider here the increased spending that derives from the higher income of low-wage <br />workers. Our model takes into account the effects of taxes and reduction in public benefits on the <br />affected workers’ take-home pay and the rate at which their households spend (as opposed to <br />save) income compared to others. Greater spending by consumers increases economic demand, <br />which translates into increases in employment and economic activity. <br />We do not expect all of the increases in household incomes to translate into increased <br />consumption demand. A substantial portion of minimum wage earners come from households in <br />the middle of the household wage distribution. These households will save some of their <br />increased income. The amount of such savings will depend on their current savings rates and on <br />the extent to which they view the increase in income as permanent, rather than a short-term <br />windfall. <br />Economic research has found that changes in permanent income generate much higher <br />consumption effects than changes that are, or are perceived as, transitory. Low wage-earners <br />who are young and have more education may regard their low-wage status as transitory. These <br />earners may regard a minimum wage increase as transitory. <br />However, recent research has found that an increasing proportion of minimum wage workers are <br />stuck in minimum wage careers (Boushey 2005; Casselman 2015). These results suggest that <br />the proportion of workers who regard a minimum wage increase as constituting a one-time <br />increase will be small. Moreover, economic theory and evidence suggests strongly that the <br />distinction between permanent and transitory income does not apply to workers who are credit- <br />constrained and whose households have accumulated very little in assets (Achdou et al. 2014). <br />The majority of minimum wage workers fit this description. <br />The IMPLAN model does not account for savings that come from transitory income. The <br />considerations above indicate that any such effects are likely to be small. This is nonetheless a <br />topic for future research. <br />5.4 Model calculations and net effects on employment for scenario A: a $15 <br />minimum wage increase in San Jose <br />Table 10 displays the results of our model for 2019. Note that the estimates in this table are <br />cumulative. They are estimated relative to the city’s minimum wage in each year, and therefore <br />capture the full effect of increases in the suggested city minimum wage in previous years. <br />8.A. - Page 55