Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 4 (continued) <br />Mayor Greenalch invited anyone else present who wished to speak to do so. No <br />one else wished to speak. <br />M /S: Stangel /Claire to close the public hearing. <br />Carried unanimously by voice vote and public hearing closed at 10 :2.4 p.m. <br />In response to question, Mr. Patterson said that the usual Professional <br />Office District zoning could not be used, since the building exceeds the <br />height allowed in such districts and that a variance would not be appropriate <br />for a new building about to be constructed. <br />M /S: Murray /Buchan to deny the appeal of DES on behalf of Sequoia <br />Professional Associates, Inc. of the decision of the Planning Director to <br />deny filing at this time of an application for a Planned Development Permit <br />for the Sequoia Professional Building and to uphold the decision of the <br />Planning Director. <br />The motion carried on the following roll call vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmen Buchan, Claire, LaBerge, Murray and Mayor Greenalch <br />Noes: Councilmen Bury, Stangel <br />MINUTE ORDER NO. 88 -106 <br />City Attorney Schricker said that findings will be prepared for approval for <br />the July 2.5, 1988 Council meeting. <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />5. Public Hearing - Appeal of the conditions of the <br />Zoning Administrator re sign program for wall and <br />awnings, Architectural Permit, E1 Camino Real/ <br />Broadway Building - Samuel Sinnot, AIA, Appellant <br />(2.03 -10) <br />Affidavit of mailing on file <br />Report: Community Development Director /Planning Director 7/6/88 <br />Appeal Letter 6/24/88 <br />Mayor Greenalch declared the public hearing open at 10:50 p.m. <br />Samuel Sinnott, architect, representing Clair Robison, said that the odd <br />configuration of the building prompts the request for more signs than two for <br />each tenant and asked approval of his appeal. <br />In response to question, Planning Director Patterson said that the additional <br />signs requested and called "unobtrusive" have individual 12" square letters <br />and noted that the appellant has also mentioned certain lighting is planned <br />which has not yet been either submitted or approved. <br />Nita Spangler, 0 70 Edgewood Road, urged Council to uphold the Planning <br />Director. <br />Reg.Mtg. <br />7 /11/88 <br />Page 5 <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 48 <br />Page No. 123 <br />