|
243
<br />RESOLVED by the Council of the,City of Redwood City that the
<br />City Manager of said City take the necessary. steps to exercise. the
<br />options to purchase those certain portions of Lot 3, 4 and 5 described
<br />on that certain map entitled °Map of Certain Harbor Lands Belonging to
<br />the Redwood -City Harbor Comp 11 filed for record September 23, 19210
<br />in Volume 10 of Maps at pages 5 and 46 in the Recorder's office of
<br />the County of San. Mateo, State of California, and,.further described in
<br />those certain option agreements dated Febuary 29, 1936, and made between
<br />George A. Merrill and Sarah S.- Merrill, his wife, first parties, and the
<br />City of Redwood City, second -party, and recorded November -25, 1936, in
<br />Volume 713 of Official Records at page 427, San Mateo -County Records,
<br />and also that certain option agreement dated the 26th day of February,
<br />1936, and made between JosephrAtwood., Executor of the 1ast,Will and,
<br />Testament of Andrew A: Brown,deceased, and Peter Tum Suden, Executor
<br />of the last Will and Testament of Ada I. Brown, deceased, the parties
<br />of the first part, and.the City of Redwood.City, party of the second
<br />part, and recorded on November 25, 1936, in Volume 713 of Official
<br />Records at page 429, San Mateo County Records, and also.that certain
<br />option agreement made -and entered into the 29th day,of February, 1936,
<br />between Lilian A. Rolph, first party, and the City of Redwood City,
<br />second party, and.recorded November 25, 1936, in Volume 713 of Official
<br />Records: at,page 427, San Mateo County. Records, when the City has the
<br />money available for the payment of'. the purchase price of said lands and
<br />the exercising of said options.
<br />Councilman Eva, seconded by Councilman Christensen, proposed the adoption of several resolu-
<br />tions, per sample below, pertaining to foreclosure proceedings in connection with
<br />delinquent 1915 Act Bond Assessments. Unanimously carried.
<br />RESOLUTION ORDERING FORECLOSURE OF STREET IMPROVEMENT
<br />ASSESSMENT NO. 91B
<br />UNDER RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. J-10
<br />RESOLVED'by the Council of the City of Redwood.City that the
<br />City Attorney be and he is hereby ordered and directed ,to.commence and.
<br />prosecute to conclusion an action in the Superior Court of the State of
<br />California, in and for the County of San Mateo, to foreclose the delin-
<br />quent street assessments under the "Improvement Bond Act of 19151, of
<br />the State of California, upon the following described real property
<br />situated in said City of Redwood City, to -wit:
<br />Northwesterly portion of Lot 16, Block 7., New High- School Acres:,
<br />fronting 40, feet on St. Francis Avenue•, as shown on that certain
<br />map entitled•"New High School Acres" Redwood City, California,
<br />filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County,
<br />June 25, 1923, in Volume it of Maps at pages 36, 37 and 3g.
<br />The City Attorney explained that he had had a conversation with the Attorney representing
<br />Mrs. Dayse D. London in connection with her claim against the City for injuries sustained
<br />when she fell on the sidewalk on Broadway near Birch Street, and that he had recommended
<br />that the claim of $1,500 be compromised for the sum of $500. On motion of Councilman
<br />Jones, seconded by Councilman McNulty, the City Attorney was suthor12ed to make the
<br />compromise as suggested.
<br />Councilman Eva, seconded by Councilman Jones, proposed that the City Attorney prepare an amend -
<br />went to existing ordinances covering the location of nursery schools, convalescent homes
<br />and similar institutions in the first and second residential sections of the City and
<br />that such suggested amendment be prepared for submission to the Planning Commission.
<br />Carried.
<br />Councilman Eva reported that he had been approached by property owners along E1 Camino Real
<br />who complained that because of the excessive restrictions, it was unprofitable for them
<br />to consider making any improvements, and in line with this discussion, Councilman Eva
<br />proposed, seconded by Councilman McNulty, that the Clerk be asked to take up with the
<br />
|