Laserfiche WebLink
X60- D <br />work hereinbefore described be and the same is hereby awarded <br />to the MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY at the price submitted in <br />their bid on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City <br />of Redwood City; provided, however, that this award is made <br />subject to the approval of the bid of the said Miller Con- <br />struction Company by the Federal Emergency Administration of <br />Pablic Works. <br />Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Redwood <br />City at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 17th day of <br />October, 1939, by the following vote: <br />Ayes and in favor of the passage of the foregoing reso- <br />lution, Councilmen, H. F. Anderson, E. A. Fletcher, Wm. Hohn, <br />R. N. Jones, P. A. McCarthy, G. W. McNulty, L. C. Christensen. <br />Noes and against the passage of the foregoing resolution, <br />Councilmen, None. <br />Absent, Councilmen, None. <br />L. C. Christensen <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />Attest: <br />B. E. Myers <br />Clerk of the City of Redwood City <br />I hereby approve the foregoing resolution this 17th day <br />of October, 1939- <br />L. C. Christensen <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />Roy W. Cloud, co-owner of property at 2061 Broadway, appeared before the Council in <br />connection with the abatement proceedings. He indicated a willingness either <br />to repair the building or have it torn down and asked permission to delay <br />the matter until he could ascertain what the repairs would cost in order <br />to decide what to do. In line with this request, the hearing on this <br />abatement proceeding was continued on motion of Councilman McCarthy, seconded <br />by Councilman McNulty, to November 7 at 9 P.M. <br />Stanton Mullen, 549 Whipple Avenue, appeared to ask permission of the Council to <br />continue construction of his new dwelling. He had been living in a large <br />garage building as temporary structure. In the process of the new con- <br />struction, it was discovered that the original building was too close to <br />the easterly property line and the Building Inspector did not wish to give <br />