My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'Councilman Hilton felt the people" in the sanitary district were assuming .a great <br />deal in receiving bids 'for 'the work before consulting the Council. City Manager <br />Mead stated that he had discussed the matter with the County Engineer and was <br />completsly, satisfied -that the sewer system had sufficient capacity. Mayor Granger <br />stated he would like further advice on the matter. and would like it, ref, erred to <br />the consulting engineer. Councilman Fletcher stated that the Agreement,was to <br />call in a consulting engineer when the -City Manager deemed It..advisable and mov°ed <br />that the City Manager's recommendatlon.be accepted." Mayor Granger asked City <br />Attorney McCarthy to read the, agreement. - After,the agreement was read, there was <br />some discussion in regard to the method of payment.. Mayor Granger was of the <br />opinion that the Charges should "be.in'.the nature of a,'lien against' the .property.. <br />The City Attorney stated that Inas the .intent of the agreement,, The district will <br />levy an assessment against the property, using the same method as in assessing <br />• taxes. The County will collect from each piece of property and -remt.to the City <br />In•answer to Mayor Granger's question -as to whether the agreement was to.b.e re- <br />corded, City Attorney McCarthy said it did not necessarily:have to be.' .Mayor.. <br />'Granger believed the,agreement should be "recorded. <br />Mr. Nuckolls spoke from the floor stating that this was,a -special-district <br />formed for a special purpose and should come under the jurisdiction -o£ the <br />Board of Supervisors. City Attorney McCarthy stated it was not and er,the super- <br />vision of the Board of Supervisors but under their protection. The district was r <br />formed'under�the direction of the Board of Superviscma nor '.with the aid of the <br />district attorney. The district had its 'own Board of. Directors, own attorney <br />and own accounts. The Board of Supervisors must,however, levy and collect the <br />assessments. <br />oruoa 1f nntinA to 4nrm this district has been nnblished. <br />to which City Attorney McCarthy stated it had been .publ'ished'in the San Carlos <br />and Belmont papers. <br />Mrs. Miramontes asked the City. Attorney If some arrangement could not <br />be made: whereby the County Engineer would make the survey and theCounty ad <br />i <br />'vaned the assessments to the City and ah en the fees are collected, credit .them <br />to the County Treasury. She stated that'i£ taxes are not paid the first year,, <br />the records are transferred to the Cont'roller's office. and the City would,have <br />.to check each year in regard to the amount due it. City Attorney McCarthy <br />doubted if it would be feasible to workout such an agreement with the .Coua,ty, <br />as it is not a matter under the direct supervision of the Board of Supervisors. <br />City Manager Mead asked the City Attorney if it wasn't the district :and not the <br />• individual who was responsible for payment.of the assessment, to which City <br />i Attorney answered that the districtaagrees to pay the City $6.00 per- year Per <br />(! connection and they would assess the individual property owner. <br />i <br />Makor Grarg er asked with whom money was deposited. The City Attorney.re- <br />f <br />plied that all funds are deposited with the County Treasurer and the district <br />''dust draw warrants on the Treasurer. An assessment is made for any funds the <br />district' vbuld' <br />need for its district purposes. <br />I <br />LY ,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.