My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and two room apartments and asked that the matter be placed on the agenda for <br />the second meeting in June. <br />City Clerk Dodge read report of City Manager Mead and City Attorney McCarthy. in regard <br />to position of treasurer and auditor being held by one person. The report statei. <br />that it is contrary to the intent and spirit of the Charter to designate the <br />treasurer as also the auditor, and that whenever an auditor is appointed the <br />person so appointed must be a different individual from -the treasurer, therefore, <br />it was the opinion of .the City Attorney that -the appropriate action to be taken <br />by the Council was to authorize the treasurer (or other officer) to perform the <br />duties of the city auditor until a separate person is appointed as auditor. <br />Councilman Armstrong was of the opinion that if it was necessary to appoint <br />someone to perform the duties of auditor it should be,someone other than the <br />treasurer. In his opinion, the duties of the two offices should not be performer. <br />by the same person: City Attorney McCarthy was of the opinion that.it was not <br />necessary for the Council to take action to appoint an auditor until the <br />necessity arose. Councilman Granger referred to Section 55 in the Charter, <br />•stating that assessment rolls must be approved bye the auditor. City Attorney <br />McCarthy stated that the treasurer approved the assessment rolls because the <br />Charter stated that until an auditor is appointed the Treasurer will perform <br />the duties as an auditor. He stated that if the Council concurred with Mr. <br />Armstrong in that it is not right to designate the treasurer to perform the <br />duties of auditor then the Council could designate some other officer.: It was <br />his opinion that the Charter means that the treasurer is to do that until an <br />auditor_is.appointed. Councilman Anderson asked why things could not go on as <br />at present until an auditor is felt necessary by the Council, stating we did <br />not need an auditor at the present time. City Attorney McCarthy stated that <br />there was a resolution designating the treasurer as auditor which Councilman <br />Armstrong wished to have rescinded. Councilman Armstrong stated there were other <br />city officials whose duties would not conflict with the duties of auditor, such <br />as the city clerk. City Manager Alead pointed out that Mr. Dodge has a separate <br />bond under each of his offices. The matter was placed on the agenda for the <br />second meeting in June for further study. <br />City Manager Mead stated that he had asked City Attorney McCarthy to prepare a <br />resolution authorizing the application for $9,245.00 of Lanham Act Funds to carry <br />on the recreational activities for the coming year to July 1, 1945, explaining <br />that the amount was based on the percentage of funds to be appropriated by the <br />city for recreational purposes. Councilman Fletcher offered the•sesolution, <br />seconded by Councilman Anderson. _On roll call motion passed unanimous]y. <br />' Resolution authorizing W. W. Hilton, as Mayor, to enter the safety deposit box at the <br />Bank of America was offered by Councilman Fletcher, seconded by Councilman <br />Armstrong. Under the question, Councilman Granger stated that he didn't dee <br />why two or three people were involved in going into the safety deposit box. <br />Councilman Armstrong stated that it was a requirement of the bank. He -didn't <br />believe that <br />the Bank of <br />America or any other <br />bank would accept anyone having <br />authority to <br />enter alone. <br />Councilman McNulty <br />stated that the treasurer must be <br />3 <br />H <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.