Laserfiche WebLink
�J <br />it <br />F <br />that there mould be another used cQ.r lot on El Camino Real, Councilmen Armstrons <br />•end Granger being of that opinion. Councilman Anderson suggested that the pre- <br />sent location be abandoned and no new permit be granted at the old location. <br />Attorney Edmund Scott advised the Council that he was representing the man, i.4r. <br />W. A. Van Buren, who was going to make application for a used car lot at the <br />' old location. Mr. Van Buren advised the council that he did not wish to make <br />application until Bair. Cuddy's license had been transferred. Motion before the <br />council passed unanimously. <br />Communication was received from Harvey C. O'Dell, 2345 Middlefield Road, requesting <br />that dance permit be issued in his name at t1re place of business formerly <br />oper-ated under the name Canep a's. Cotuzcilman Armstrong asked City Attorney McCarthy <br />if the ordinance allowed the issuance of a dance permit where liquor was served. w <br />City Attorney McCarthyrepliedthat no dance permit was allowed in the same room. <br />i <br />where liquor was served and read excerpts from the ordinance which stated that <br />dancing had to be done in a separate enclosure from the place in which liquor was <br />sold. It was the consensus of the council that dancing should not be held in <br />such close proximity to the selling of liquor .and Councilman Armstrong moved than <br />the application for a dance permit be denied, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. <br />i <br />Councilman Anderson stated he was going to vote against the motion for the reaso:n <br />that if one dance permit was denied, all should be. Councilman McNulty concurred <br />in Councilman Anderson's opinion. On a roll call vote, the motion failed to <br />r <br />i;. carry with Councilmen Armstrong and Britschgi voting in the affirmative and <br />I <br />Councilmen Anderson, Fletcher, Granger, McNulty and Mayor Hilton voting in the <br />�? negative. <br />' Councilman Fletcher moved that the necessary license be granted, under the <br />same conditions as the former permit was granted, seconded by Councilman McNulty„ <br />Motion carried with Councilmen Armstrong, and Britschgi voting in the negative. <br />City Clerk Dodge read communication from the Peninsula Division of the Leagueodf <br />s <br />California Cities advising that thb next rdeeting of the League would be held <br />I <br />Thursday, September 21, at 6:45 P.T.T. at Kloss Hall; San°Mateo, and noted those <br />signifying their intention of being present. <br />City Clerk Dodge read communication from C. G. Uhlenberg in regard to the cost of <br />auditing books and accounts of the city monthly in the form of a continuous audit <br />and submitting monthly reports to the council, which information had been re- <br />quested of him by Councilmen Armstrong and Granger. The cost of this service, <br />including the annual report, would not exceed '$1500.00 annually. <br />. Councilman Granger moved that the matter be placed on the agenda of the <br />next meeting and that some thought be given to this plan as a subotitute to <br />hiring a treasurer. The present treasurer, if this proposed plan went into effect, <br />would remain as treasurer and divorce himself as auditor. The.public auditor <br />would act as city auditor. In his opinion, Coiincilman Granger believed the city <br />would derive the same result from this plan as it would if a treasurer were <br />appointed. <br />