Laserfiche WebLink
�i <br />were not very promising as many of the owners were selling their lots. Some <br />of the owners are considering the matter and may give the city a temporaiq <br />lease, however, it was the City Managerls opinion that not much could be done <br />In regard to leveling the lots at this time of the year and he suggested that <br />the effort be continued to obtain these lots and to find some property that <br />can be used semi -permanently for recreation purposes and at the proper time <br />of the year the lots could be leveled. Councilman Granger moved,seconded <br />by Councilman Anderson, that the matter be carried on the agenda for the <br />first meeting in March. Motion passed unanimously. <br />City Attorney McCarthy asked that the report on the status of Pennsylvania Ave- <br />nue be held over to the next meeting. The matter was placed on the agenda. <br />City Manager Blom reported that he had discussed with Mr. Marcus of the S. H. <br />Frank Company the matter of obtaining sufficient land in the sewage treat- <br />ment plant area to take care of the Animal Shelter site. Mr. Marcus advised <br />that there has been a change in management and that he was not in a position <br />to discuss the matter. He asked that -City Manager Blom wait until after the <br />first of the year to discuss the matter. Councilman Anderson moved, seconded <br />by.Oouncilman Fletcher, that the matter be placed on the agenda for the first <br />meeting in February. Motion passed unanimously. <br />City Manager Blom reported that he had checked further in regard to franchise <br />granted for railway -on Chestnut Street and found that Ordinance No. 113, <br />dated #pril 122 1912, granted to-2dward Fitzpatrick a franchise for a street <br />railway system provided that he pave the area between the tracks and two <br />feet on the side.thereof. Ordinance No. 151, passed in March, 1915, provided <br />fortthe transfer of the franchise from Fitzpatrick to the Redwood Harbor <br />Company and the same conditions applied. The present ordinance, No. 2069 <br />dated April 5, 1920, also reads the same. All franchises which have been <br />granted call for pavement between the tracks and on two feet on the side <br />thereof.• City Manager Blom reported that the Southern Pacific Company had <br />completed their.portion of the work of paving this street. <br />City Attorney McCarthy presented copies of proposed taxicab ordinance and advised <br />that he and City Manager Blom had checked the present ordinance regulating <br />a <br />taxicabs and -those of other cities. He advised that it would be more appro- <br />priate to enact a new ordinance rather than amend the old one as there is' <br />too much which would have to be deleted or changed. The matter was placed <br />on the agenda to allow time for study of the proposed ordinance. <br />City Manager Blom advised that originally the Luxor Cab Company had requested <br />five permits which had been granted and that subsequently two Kazazean <br />brothers had requested two permits. The Kazazeans were entering into an <br />agreement with the Luxor•Cab and it was upon his s®gestion that these two <br />permits were issued in the name of Luxor Cab. The agreement between the <br />Luxor Cab and the Kaza.zeans was not consummated and he recommended that two <br />permits be issued in the name of the Kazazean brothers. A representative of <br />Luzor addressed the Council advising that they had anticipated the use of <br />these two permits and requested that they be granted them. Councilman <br />175 <br />