BOOK 20_1945-05-21 to 1946-09-03

Browse Search

Q 5. Recommending a denial of the application of Luigi Ramacciotti to rezone. Lots 2 and 4 9n Block F. Woodside Acres No. 1, Kentfield Avenue, between Woodside Road and Palm Avenue from second residental to business district zone. City Attorney McCarthy advised that.the Planning Commission had thought it inadvisable to allow a greenhouse to be built in that block Inasmuch as it is a residential area. Councilman Anderson moved, seconded ' by Councilman Armstrong, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission 6' r LJ D v E to deny the application of.Luigi Ramaociotti to rezone Lots 2 and 4, Block F. Woodside Acres No. 1, be sustained. Motion passed unanimously. In connection with this, Councilman Britschgi asked the Street Sup - erintendent to'inspect^ Kentfield Avenue as there were several ruts and bad places in the road. 6. Recommending the granting,of the application of Dr. T.H.R.Gurnee,Jr. to change the setback lines on Block 4, Lot 4, Mezesville, Range "C" on Bradford and Winslow Streets to 7-1/2 feet and also recommending that per- mission be granted to him to establish a dental clinic in a building to be built there. Inasmuch as this property adjoins business property and it was indicated that a petition would be filed to change the block to business, the Planning Commission voted favorably to change the setback line. Coun- cilman Anderson stated that the foundation had already been poured for the building and asked by what right work had been done before the council took action on the change in setback. Building Inspector Duncan advised that the contractor was not observing the change in setback but that,he might add a porch or addition to the front later. ,City Attorney McCarthy advised that inasmuch as changing.the setback would necessitate enactment of an ordinance action might be deferred until the need arose for the change. Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson, that action be deferred until change in setback is necessary. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Recommending that the application of Mr. and Mrs. A.V.Wright to resubdivi4e:Lct 12 and the northwesterly half of Lot 11, Block K, Boyd and I Kent's subdivision, Woodside Road and Madrone Street, into two lots facing Madrone Street be granted. Councilman Fletcher offered resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Anderson, resubdividing Lot 12 and northwesterly half of Lot 11, Block K, Boyd and Kent's subdivision, Woodside Road and Madrone Street into two lots facing Woodside Road instead of facing Madrone Street. On roll call, .resolution was unanimously adopted. RES O L U T,I O N No. 260 AUTHORIZING MR. and MRS A. V. WRIGHT TO RESUBDIVIDE LOT 12 and A PORTION OF LOT 11 IN'BLOCK K OF BOYD AND KENT'S ADDITION WHEREAS, MR. and MRS. A. V. WRIGHT have made porper application to the Planning Commission of the City of Redwood City to resubdivide and Lot 12 and the Northwesterly one-half of Lot 11 in Block K as shown on a map entitled "Boyd and Kent's Addition" filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, on June 12, 1905 in Book D of Maps at page 10; WHEREAS, notice of hearing of'said Planning Commission on said App11- 187