My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 20_1945-05-21 to 1946-09-03
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1945 to 1946 Book 20
>
BOOK 20_1945-05-21 to 1946-09-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 1:35:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 1:18:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/21/1945
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
504
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
294 <br />grant an additional ten feet to the city which would probably be enough to <br />widen the street. Councilman Britsehgi moved, seconded by Councilman Granger <br />that the City Attorney be instructed to have circulated a petition in regard �f <br />to a grant of easement of fifteen feet on Pennsylvania Avenue from Winslow <br />to Main Street. Motion passed unanimously. City Manager Blom suggested` <br />that it might be well to get an agreement with the Southern Pacific in re- <br />gard to the use of the 18.5 feet franchise for the rest of the life of the <br />franchise. <br />Councilman Britsehgi asked if anything had been heard from the Southern Pacific <br />Company in regard to the passenger trains stopping on the Broadway crossing. <br />City Attorney McCarthy advised he had not as yet had an opportunity of dis- <br />oussing this matter with the railroad company. <br />Councilman Granger stated that it had been recommended when two way signals were <br />installed at the railroad crossings at Rogers, Main and Broadway that the <br />operator would wear some means of identification to distinguish him from <br />other pedestrians. In the beginning, Sam Browne hats had been worn but this <br />practice had been discontinued. He believed the agreement with the Southern <br />Pacific should be checked in regard to this point. <br />City Manager Blom reported that in connection with the three lots on Valota Road <br />which the Council had voted to pay county taxes in order to acquire for <br />recreational purposes, these lots were not adjacent to the proposed recrea- <br />tion area. City Attorney McCarthy was asked if the city could get title to <br />these lots. City Attorney McCarthy advised that under the Revenue and Tax- <br />ation Code, the city can pay the delinquent county taxes and get a tax deed <br />from the county. The former owner could not redeem the lot unless they re- <br />imbursed the city for the county taxes paid. He said it would not be pos- <br />sible to get a perfect deed until a McEnerney Suit was filed. It was de- <br />cided that as long as the lots were•not adjacent to the recreation area, it <br />might be well to acquire these lots for the purpose of straightening Valota <br />Road and it was decided to let the matter stand as decided at the last <br />meeting of the Council; i.e., pay the county taxes and_get a certificate of <br />redemption to these lots. <br />City Manager Blom reported that at a recent joint meeting of the Council and <br />Port Commission, the Port Commission had agreed to let the city use the <br />present site of the Yacht Harbor for a stated number of years and, in view <br />of that, he believed the Recreation Commission might be asked to reconsider <br />their action and take back the jurisdiction of the Yacht Harbor. The Port <br />i <br />Commission had agreed to let the city occupy the Yacht Harbor for a period <br />of five years with.the provision that they would assist the Recreation Com- <br />mission to find a suitable area in case the property is needed for indus- <br />trial purposes. City Manager Blom stated, if necessary, the city could oper- <br />ate the Yacht Harbor. He also edvised that the Cooley development across <br />the Bayshore Highway from San Carlos might be a suitable location for the <br />Yacht Harbor. This property, however, is outside the city limits and was <br />not looked with favor upon by some of the Council. It was the general con- <br />sensus that the present location should be improved for the coming season. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.