My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1946 to 1948 Book 21
>
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 1:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/1946
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
517
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
D <br />iz <br />W. W. HILTON <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />ATTEST: <br />RALPH S. DODGE <br />Clerk of the City of Redwood City <br />I hereby.approve the foregoing resolution <br />this 17th day of March, 1947. <br />141 <br />W. W. HILTON <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />City Attorney McCarthy advised that the proposed ordinance regulating the operation of <br />restaurants had been submitted to the County Health Department and a letter had been <br />received from Dr. Gans highly recommending the passage of this ordinance. The Health <br />Department attempts to make four inspections of restaurants each year. Councilman <br />Granger offered introduction of ordinance governing the operation of restaurants, <br />seconded by Councilman McNulty. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Affidavit of publication of ordinance amending ordinance annexing Atherwood Subdivision <br />was ordered filed on motion of Councilman Werder, seconded by Councilman McNulty. <br />Motion passed unanimously. <br />Councilman Armstrong moved adoption of ordinance amending ordinance annexing Atherwood <br />Subdivision, seconded by Councilman McNulty. On roll call, ordinance was unani- <br />mously adopted with Councilman Britschgi absent. City Attorney McCarthy advised <br />that since the meeting when this ordinance was introduced, Mr. Frost, the engineer, <br />had contacted him and stated the subdivider was anxious for the certificate of <br />annexation to be filed. He was of the opinion that the amended ordinance correct- <br />ing the description was not necessary and asked that the city file the ordinance <br />as first adopted without being amended. It was the opinion of the City Manager, <br />City Engineer and City Attorney that the original ordinance could be filed with the <br />Secretary of State and if any question arises the amended, ordinance shou]d then be <br />filed. It was so ordered. <br />In regard to the proposed ordinance providing for subdividers to pay for installation of <br />water mains, City Manager Blom stated that in addition to the installation of water <br />mains, the City Engineer and he would like to suggest other items to be furnished <br />by the subdivider such as street lighting, street name signs, manner in which plans <br />a , <br />are submitted, some details in regard to the storm sewers and requirements of street <br />tree planning. It was the City Manager's recommendation that the subdivision ordi- <br />nance be revised to include all the above items. He also stated that a good deal <br />of thought has been given to recommending that the city require subdividers to in - <br />elude the full cost of water mains and fire hydrants as a part of the cost of the <br />project with no refund in the future. He stated it was hard to make refunds when <br />the work is done under public improvement proceedings and that the cost of improve- <br />ments was received from the purchaser from the subdivider. Councilman Armstrong <br />asked if other municipalities were making refunds on water connections. City <br />Manager Blom replied that it was a general trend throughout the country to discontinue <br />jmaking refunds. The California Water Service Company is required to operate under <br />the rules of the Railroad Commission and they do make refunds, either on a percentage <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.