Laserfiche WebLink
19 8. City Attorney Currie stated that in his opinion certain legal steps were 311 <br />necessary as a preliminary to any such increase, and that time should be granted for <br />the preparation of necessary material. Councilman Holmquist thereupon withdrew his <br />original motion, and moved that the increase in water rates be placed on the agenda, <br />pending necessary action by the City Attorney. Councilman McNulty seconded the motion <br />which carried. <br />LETTER FROM THE CITY MANAGER RELATIVE TO BIDS ON'THE STEINBERGER STREET fill was read. He <br />stated, that inasmuch as no competitive bids were received on a truck measurement <br />basis, he would recommend that all bids be rejected and bidders be invited to resub- <br />mit bids by truck measurement or some other practical method, to -be determined. Coun- <br />oilman Granger moved that bids be rejected, bldder'•s bonds -returned, and that City <br />Manager call for new bids on the Steinberger Street fill, to be in the office of the <br />City Manager before 2:30 P. M. Tuesday, December 30, 1947- Motion was seconded by <br />{ <br />Councilman Swift, and carried. <br />�'. APPLICATION OF BERT OBACK FOR PERMIT TO OPERATE A USED CAR LOT. City Attorney Currie re- <br />ported that he had contacted the Attorney for the Automobile Dealers Association, i+h o <br />had prepared an ordinance regulating used car dealers in Redwood City. Cbpies of the <br />proposed ordinance were handed the Council for their study prior to the introduction <br />of the ordinance. Inasmuch as no one present had had an opportunity to study the pro- <br />posed new ordinance regulating used car dealers, it was not known whether the pro- <br />visions of the ordinance, when adopted, would in any way interfere with the applies - <br />tion being considered. Councilman Granger moved that permit be granted Bert Oback <br />i' <br />subject to any and all regulations contained in the new ordinance, when introduced <br />and adopted. Councilman Swift seconded the motion. Councilman Werder pointed out <br />,� that nothing could be gained by granting the permit to Mr. Oback before conditions <br />of the new ordinance were known to the Council, since no dealer would be likely to <br />{ invest money in complying with present regulations which might be considerably changed <br />tl <br />CI by the adoption of the -new ordinance. He stated further, that it would take Mr. <br />f <br />Oback some time to obtain all other permits and licenses necessary for the operation <br />of such a business, and that in his opinion the applicant would not be materially <br />hurt by a further delay pending study of the proposed ordinance by the Council. Coun- <br />oilman Granger thereupon withdrew his motion, and the application of Bert Oback, and <br />a similar application from Russ Denney were delayed until after study of the new <br />ordinance by the Council. <br />i <br />CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ON PROPOSED AMUSEMENT LICENSE ORDINANCE. This ordinance has been <br />prepared, without the amounts filled in. If the committee will meet and fill in the <br />t` atnounts, the ordinance will then be ready. City Auditor Brophy stated that the State <br />„II <br />Board of Equalization had requested that this matter be held up for another two weeks, <br />so that their representative could meet with the committee.. The'matter was therefore <br />placed on the agenda. <br />PROPOSED RESOLUTION BROADWAY No. 3. City Attorney presented two resolution to the Council. <br />Resolution of Preliminary Determination to do certain work in the area known as <br />•Broadway No. 3. This Resolution was offered in order to start proceedings necessary <br />t <br />to comply with the Debt Limitations Act. The second Resolution offered by the City <br />" Attorney was for Preliminary Approval of Plans and Specifications for the area, which <br />E were prepared by Frost and Brian, and have been paid for. After discussion having to <br />