Laserfiche WebLink
incidentals on a percentage basis, the ratio being applied only on the area out- <br />side of the subdivision. The assessments for within the subdivision will not be <br />worked out until completion of the work. Any contingencies that might arise will <br />be borne by the subdivider. , <br />In the bid form, 3rd paragraph "Article III should be "Article IIa". Mr. Cohn <br />affixed his initials as affirming to the change. <br />Mr. Blom brought out that while the city is going to award a contract for approxi- <br />mately $146,000 the contract does not provide for acceptance by the Contractor of <br />bonds or proceeds of bonds. It was his opinion that the City might be assuming <br />liability in case of refusal of the Land Development Company to purchase the bonds. <br />He asked'.if it -would be feasible to award the contract on the basis of acceptance <br />of the proceeds of the bonds. Mr. Wilson stated the contract was accepted under <br />the 1911 Bond Act. Councilman Armstrong asked if it was not unusal for bonds to <br />be bought on an installment basis. Mr. 'Wilson advised that the bid was made under <br />the 1913 proceedings, a method used extensively for many years. The .Land Develop- <br />ment Company is obligated by a contract to purchase the bonds. If they make an <br />assignment of the sale of the bonds it can only be done with Council approval. <br />L. C. Smith, lora bidder on the project, was in the audience and was asked if he <br />understood the basis on which the contract was to be let. He advised that he <br />was familiar with the provisions of the contract; that the city has no obligation <br />in the matter and that he would look solely to the proceeds of the sale of the <br />bonds for payment. Councilman Armstrong offered resolution authorizing sale of <br />bonds in Redwood Terrace No. I and adjacent territory and moved its.adoption, <br />seconded by Councilman McNulty. Under question, Councilman Granger asked if it <br />was necessary to have the corporate seal on the bid. Both City Attorney McCarthy <br />and Mr. Wilson advised it was not. On roll call, resolution was unanimously <br />adopted with Councilman Swift absent. <br />RESO LUT ION No. 419 <br />AUTHORIZING SALE OF BONDS - REDWOOD TERRACE No. 1 AND ADJACENT TERRITORY <br />RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Redwood City, California, that <br />WHEREAS, said City Council has received a written proposal by the Land <br />Development Company to purchase the improvement bonds to be issued by this City <br />to represent the unpaid assessments levied pursuant to Resolution.of Intention <br />No. 392 adopted by this City Council on September 3, 1946, for the payment of <br />the costs and incidental expenses of the public improvements in Redwood Terrace <br />No. 1 and Adjacent Territory in said City; and <br />WHEREAS, in the opinion of this City Council the public -interest and general <br />welfare will be served by accepting said offer and selling said bonds; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that said proposal be, and the same is hereby <br />accepted, and that said -bonds, in an amount not to exceed $190,077.91 be, and <br />they are hereby, ordered sold to said bidder at the amount and subject to the terms <br />and conditions stated in its said bid. <br />IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the interest rate of said bonds be, and the same <br />Is hereby fixed at five per cent (5%) per annum. <br />I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of resolution adopted by <br />the City Council of the City of Redwood City, California, at a regular meeting <br />thereof held on the 13th day of January, 1947, by the following vote of the <br />members thereof: <br />AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmen: ARMSTRONG, BRITSCHGI, GRANGER, <br />MC NULTY, WERDER and Mayor HILTON <br />NOES, Councilmen: NONE <br />ABSENT, Councilmen: SWIFT <br />APPROVED: RALPH S. DODGE __ City Clerk of the <br />City of Redwood City <br />W. W. HILTON - Mayor of Redwood City <br />261 2 <br />