My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1948 to 1950 Book 22
>
BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 2:56:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 2:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/17/1948
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Councilman Britschgi moved that request be granted, seconded by Councilman.Morgan. 383 <br />Motion carried unanimously on roll call. <br />MR WAYNE R. MILLINGTON APPEARED IN REGARD TO LARRY MORAN. Mr. IJ[illington stated the charges <br />for which Mr. Moran had been suspended from the City employ were dropped and in view <br />of this would like to have him be able to resign as -of November 29th to become effec- <br />tive December 13th and receive two weeks salary from the City as a compromis measure. <br />Councilman Spillers moved that the two weeks salary be paid, seconded by Councilman <br />Swift. Motion was later withdrawn with consent of the second. After discussion, the <br />general thought of the Council was that they did not wish to take the prerogative of <br />the Personnel Board making such a recommendation to them, but they would not object to <br />such recommendation coming from the Personnel Board if they wished to grant•Dlr.•. <br />Millington's request. City Attorney Currie's opinion was that the Personnel Board's <br />decision would be final according to the Personnel Ordinance. On motion of Councilman <br />Spillers, seconded by Councilman Swift the matter was referred to the Personnel Board <br />for their decision and any action they may deem necessary to settle the matter amicably, <br />the City Attorney to advise them as to the legality of payment of back salary, if they <br />so desire. Councilman Granger stated he would like the minutes to show that the pay- <br />ment of salary if recommended by the Personnel Board would be legal. Motion carried <br />on roll call, Councilmen Holmquist and Morgan voting No. <br />SPECIAL YACHT HARBOR COMMITTEE. Councilman Granger stated the committee had met in regard <br />to the 180 acre area and asked for further time as another meeting would be held the <br />following Monday night, January 23rd with the entire Council. A further report would <br />be made at the next regular meeting. <br />ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE 600, REZONING BLOCK 51 FRIENDLY ACRES No.l <br />from R-4 to R-2, and amending Zoning Ordinance 600 was offered for adoption by Council- <br />man Spillers, seconded by Councilman Swift and carried on roll call. <br />PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS LAUREL STREET. Mayor Werder ordered the affidavits of publication <br />and posting filed. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION TO CONSTRUCT CERTAIN -IMPROVEMENTS, <br />LAUREL STREET. There were no protests. <br />M1 <br />RESOLUTION No. 817 OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY, LAUREL STREET. Councilman Spillers <br />offered resolution and moved adoption, seconded by Councilman Holmquist and carried on <br />roll call. <br />RES OLUTI O N No. 817. <br />RESOLUTION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY <br />LAUREL STREET <br />WHEREAS, on January 3, 1950, the City Council of the City of Redwood City <br />adopted a Resolution of Preliminary Determination to make public improvements in <br />the City of Redwood City, being Resolution No. 816 of said Council, to construct <br />certain public improvements more particularly described therein, and did fix therein <br />this date as the time and place when and where any and all persons interested may <br />appear and show cause, if any they have, why the City Council should not find and <br />determine that the public convenience and necessity require the improvements described <br />and referred to in said resolution without compliance with the Special Assessment, <br />Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931; and <br />WHEREAS notice of the adoption of said resolution and of said time and place of <br />hearing was given by the City Clerk by publication and posting for -the time and in <br />the manner provided in said resolution and Ordinance No. 515 of the City of Redwood <br />City, as appears from the affidavits on file with the City Clerk; and <br />WHEREAS no persons objecting to the undertaking of said proceedings without <br />first complying with the provisions of said Special Assessment, Investigation, <br />Limitation, and Majority Protest Act of 1931 have filed written objections thereto <br />with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed for this hearing by persons inter- <br />ested, owning or having an interest in real property within the proposed assessment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.