Laserfiche WebLink
pE <br />ble <br />ery <br />gh <br />the <br />ner, <br />'ry <br />ly <br />ED <br />an aPPsal should be made for State legislation providing that passage on rates for <br />245: <br />.ties supplied to suburban communities be under the jurisdiction of the State Public i <br />ntil <br />ties Commission. They asked that Redwood City also direct letters to Assemblyman Util <br />relative to the same subject. It was thought that one utility would not, be <br />Dolv�ig <br />singled out to come under State jurisdiction, that others would follow. City Manager' I <br />Rolison <br />and some of the Councilmen looked with disfavot on this suggestion. Council- ilk lI <br />man Herkner was of the opinion that the Raker Act prohibited a municipality from <br />profit on another. Assistant City Attorne °Lebsack stated a; � <br />making a P y .gopy of the act <br />:' <br />had been secured from Congressman Jack Anderson. Certain irrigation districts were k { <br />protected by the Raker Act but there was nothing definite in the Act concerning rates <br />A• 1'� .' 1 , , <br />charged to munici alities.Cit Attorney Currie was still working on this. Councilman <br />sham <br />Granger moved that this be placed on the agenda for further report from the City <br />- Attorney, seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. <br />DISCUSSION REGARDING ADVERTISING ATTACHED TO PARKING METERS. Attorney Millington appeared, <br />ttorney <br />representing Wetlands Associates and asked that this be referred to the City Attorney- <br />for any legal aspects. He submitted brochure 'to the Councilmen showing advertising <br />for <br />;.'. <br />;';?" ,;': It <br />attached to meter top with an ad on each side. Ads would be spaced, City would re- <br />ceive 113 of the income, 75v' or 01.00 per meter per month would go to the City. Mr. <br />Millington also submitted a copy of the proposed contract. Councilman Morgan thought <br />this should go before the Planning Commission for their recommendation, and moved that <br />a committee of two from the Council, `and City Manager be appointed by the Mayor, sec -I! <br />'II <br />onded by Councilman spillers, and carried. Mayor Britschgi appointed Councilmen '• <br />I .; ;',i "f <br />li' <br />] <br />Spillers, chairman Councilman Granger,, James iMac Donald of the Planning Commission <br />p , , g , g ' <br />''' <br />`ilk <br />iI it <br />City Attorney Currie, and City Manager Rolison on the committee. <br />"„' <br />;', <br />„ ' <br />AREQUEST' FOR TEMPORARY SEWER. A letter was read from City Engineer Jain in regards to <br />•y,. <br />Mr. Varsits request through Attorney Wayne Millington with recommendation that a <br />i II. <br />� <br />permit not be granted as lines are laid too shallow and subject to breakage by traffic, <br />also expensive to maintain by the City. Plans were being prepared for sewers in this`!; <br />I.'j' <br />area, which they hope will be constructed this summer. Several other property owners <br />- who wished to construct private sewers were turned down and the City Engineer felt <br />- this one should not be granted. Mr. Varsi wished to built an apartment building on <br />the corner of Manzanita and Stambaugh Streets, apartments to rent for 065.00. <br />Attorney Millington stated hir. Varsi would install, maintain and remove sewers at his <br />SIi I; <br />., <br />own expense. A cash bond would be de osited with the City,. held in the Suspense <br />P P <br />! <br />Account to insure maintenance and removal of sewers. He possessed an FHA 14 day permit <br />dated February 5th and wished to proceed before this expired as a later permit would <br />f l <br />I;I <br />be under the new regulations. Assistant Building Inspector stated the building per- <br />mit had been held u because of lack of sewers. Councilman Spillers offered resolu- <br />p <br />? <br />j '`;• : <br />No. 1030 <br />tion/and moved adoption authorizing City Attorney and City Engineer to work out some <br />II J <br />4 <br />agreement for sewers includingcash bond with Mr. Varsi similar to the previous one <br />p <br />i ,j <br />on the other buildings, so that he could proceed with his plans. Motion seconded by <br />I' <br />i0;, <br />Councilman Royer and carried on roll call. Attorney Millington had referred to <br />'• <br />;�, <br />;, <br />Resolution No -753 on the other building constructed. <br />w <br />ABA portion of Block 1, Range A, <br />TEXENT PROCEEDINGS, BUILDING AT 2041 to 2093 Broadway. A p <br />Me ze Ceo. and Betsy Frank, <br />sville, and Lot 1, Block 10 Diller Addition, Abr <br />i <br />90 Cedro ti°day,San Francisco. At the August 21st meeting Attorney Harold Anderson <br />ends to <br />appeared and asked six months extension and this was continued on the agenda i <br />