My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1950 to 1952 Book 23
>
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:19:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 3:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/15/1950
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t pr��8 E1 Canino Real, had originally submitbd a bid of 0500. Another bid was 267 <br />ed 3354 oak Knoll <br />received from Idauricia Richardson., , in the amount of <br />$300. A bid, <br />must be 900 of the appraisal. Councilman Morgan moved this be placed'on the <br />agenda, seconded by Councilman Spillers. This meant re -advertising and a loss of <br />t <br />two weeks. Motion was withdrawn by maker on consent of the second. Councilman <br />lling an then moved this be referred to the Real Estate Committee, e , seconded by <br />Councilman S p' <br />Spillers. Councilmen Spillers and Herkner conferred and recommended <br />p � <br />appraisal of 0550- Councilman Morgan moved recommendation of Committee be accepted, <br />1 <br />seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. Councilman Granger moved that bids be <br />)rneg <br />held in abeyance for report by City Attorney and in the event they do not qualify, <br />)een" <br />new bids be called, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried. <br />iad <br />CITY CLERK REPORT ONAUCTION SALES PALO ALTO AND SAN P,4ATE0. Palo Alto had no' auction <br />- <br />sales and San Mateo had a few. Their ordinance stipulated $100 per day for license <br />Ohl- - and Redwood CityIs calls for $25.00 per da <br />fee, p y. Mr. L. Walters had phoned from <br />my <br />Portland, Oregon, for Council's decision and was eager to. advertise. Councilman <br />Granger moved request be denied, seconded by Councilman Morgan. City Attorney <br />tl of <br />pointed out that under the present ordinance a business license was offered at <br />a fee of ,"'x`25.00 per day. It was brought before the Council at his suggestion to <br />.on <br />give them an opportunity to investigate. Motion was withdrawn on consent of the <br />second. Councilman Royer moved that permit be granted, seconded by Councilman <br />Spillers and carried on roll call, Councilman Granger coting Ido,. Councilman Morgan <br />moved that City Attorney give the Council members copies of this ordinance so that <br />they might study it and consider whether or not they would like to make any changes, <br />seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. <br />FdRTRER CONSIDERATION RESUBDIVISION PORTIONS LOTS 1,2,3, EDGEWOOD PART (400 BLOCK EDGE- <br />Y100D). As Mr. Dieterich did not appear or make further request, pending a deal <br />re one of these. lots, Councilman Royer moved that this be dropped from the agenda <br />and he be so notified, seconded by Councilman Priorgan and carried. <br />PLAMILIG COMI'dISSION REC0IUKENDATION TERRACE SHOPPING DISTRICT FINAL MAP. They had approved <br />an amended final map subject to (1) Lot 11, Block 2, be reserved for parking, (2) all <br />Par -king areas be restricted by deed restriction, (3) all engineering changes be made <br />as required by the City Engineer, (4) all provisions of Ordinance #631 be complied <br />with. Councilman Herkner moved approval of recorrmendation, seconded by Councilman <br />Royer. Motion carried Councilman Spillers voting No as he did not believe in <br />scattering business all over the City. BLOCK 7 <br />PLA'+t{ING COM1,IISSION RECOMMENDATION DENIAL OF R. E. McCUNE TO RESUBDIVIDE LOT 6JEDGEWOOD <br />PARK (979 BLANDFORD) so that 16.7 feet be taken from Lot 6 and added to Lot Z. Iv7r., <br />1110013ine stated his architect did not provide for tool room space and a little yard <br />in which to operate and that was the reason he purchased the lot- - However he <br />stated 13 feet would be adequate, but if he sold the lot he thought a new owner <br />Might remove a large oak tree which he wanted ti preserve. Mr. McCune was away at <br />the time the Planning Commission met. Councilman Granger moved this be referred <br />back to the Planning Commission asking them to reconsider and griving Mr, McCune an <br />opportunity to be heard by them, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Councilman Royer <br />thought it was possible to take some from the adjoining lot, but was in favor of <br />keeping the frontage as close to 70 feet as possible. Letter of appeal had been <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.