Laserfiche WebLink
274 <br />ACH OF HIS <br />ATTORNEY 17AGSTAFF STATED IF THIS WOULD BE LADE AVAILABLE HE WOULD SEE THAT E <br />! CLIENTS RECEIVED A COPY OF `HIE ESTIMATES and have them withdraw their protests on <br />o ahead witti' the • praceedings. <br />file if they were in agreement to g <br />y^ T%Tln___n S r+rRr mmr�•n <br />CITY ENGINEER JAIi1 PREFERRED THAT THE CO14;I,1ITTEE z,�_Y - ��`� -� Se,..:erixxxa PICK OUT <br />Cli j V`' <br />THOSE LOTS upon which they wished estimates, those in the area to request estimate <br />on any lot they choose. <br />1 1 ! , 1 <br />j MRS. SCHWARTZ, BAY ROAD, protested high assessment on small parcel. <br />ATTORNEY WILSON THOUGHT THAT PROPOSED CHANGES RE BAY ROAD AS NOW SET FORTH SHOULD BE <br />Ol in paroposed resolution (Section F) Page 1) and left as it was originally . <br />ivin figures both ways on spot assessments - full improvements and improvements <br />!;a•, I'n ! without the paving, and modified later after the estimate; also any changes made <br />by Frost & Brian could be red pencilled. Cards would be sent out to each one <br />w. <br />stating what their new assessment would be and a new hearing would be held at that <br />' time. City►s contribution would be two-thirds of cost of bridge. <br />COUNCILMAN ROYER ADDED To HIS MOTION INSTRUCTIONS TO FROST & BRIAN TO BRING ASSESSIdENT <br />Ali' :it .I <br />UP TO}DATE, later withdrew his motion and restated the following one: Committee <br />that was appointed by the Mayor to represent people in the area to pick out approx- <br />imately seven or ten parcels in the district as agreeable, give to City Engineer for <br />spot check, which estimates would be given to Mr. g <br />l Wa staff after certain corrections <br />i� j,4, were made by Frost & Brian as pointed out be Mr. Jain using original spread as in - <br />eluded in the plans, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Councilman Herkner thought <br />this should be done by Frost & Brian without further cost. LTotion carried on roll call, <br />1' <br />COUNCILMAN GRANGER MOVED THAT CITY ATTORNEY BRING IN RULING RE PROCEDURE TO REQUEST FROST <br />?.! & BRIAN TO BRING ASSESSLiENT UP TO DATE IN eliminating errors, seconded by Council- <br />man Royer and carried. <br />+ COUNCILmAN JONES CALLED ATTENTION TO PERSONNEL BOARD MINUTES REI'LINDING COUNCIL OF NEED <br />I; OF ASSISTANCE IN CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT and he thought too much was being ex- <br />petted of the City Engineer and that Frost & Brian should help out. <br />CITY ENGINEER WAS WORKING ON BUDGET WHICH MUST BE READY IPI 1710 WEEKS AND THERE WERE SIX <br />JOBS PENDING AT THIS TIME, SO THE DATE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED WHEN THE SPOT CHECKS <br />WOULD BE READY. Attorney Wilson suggested working with Frost & Brian in order to <br />10 <br />1'{� let out bid as soon as possible. Councilman Royer moved that this be duly and reg- <br />l�'1 "•I' ularly continued to April 16th, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. Attorney <br />Wagstaff suggested four parcels from Bay Road area be included to be selected by <br />,f <br />!" '• `' Mr. Henry. <br />,y <br />BROADIVAY-MARSHALL HEARING CLOSED AT 10:35 PLI. <br />C RECREATION - REDWOOD VILLAGE Lir. <br />• ,�' I,4.P. Traver protested months of delay for building of <br />area for children. Letter dated March 13th from State Recreation Commission, signed <br />II ,. �, i ` w' ''; I { � by Sterling S. ','Jinans <br />. , Director of Recreation was read, explaining delay on survey <br />for Redwood City because of chenge in their staff, occasioned by the temporary loan <br />of personnel to the Statewide Civil Defense organization. Their report could be <br />if <br />%,t p given on April 16th or 17th if this met with the approval of Council and school dis- <br />t'41ricts who made the original request. Councilman Morgan moved this be placed on <br />flI till, <br />agenda until such time as survey could take <br />place of April 16th, seconded by Council- <br />,, ' I ; <br />man Spillers and carried. <br />f! It�, j <br />