BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21

Browse Search

t r by Councilman Spillers and carried. This was again brought forth later in the meet) the ABATEMEN ing by those in the audience. ROFESSIONAL OFFICE IN R -DISTRICTS. City Attorney s J. FURTHER CONSIDERATION ON ORDINACE FOR P i ith the Planning Commission at their Currie stated he would like to take this up t�rk was "parking on the building site" were used but "building rep next meeting; the words t z . This was put on the agenda. t ity site" was not defined SIX TAX DELINQUENT LOTS IN VIRGINIA AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. City Clerk Dodge reported, Spi i that N W 1/2 of Lot 2!}, a Lots 25 and 30, S E 1/2 of 31 and N W 1/2 of 31, all in ' to t Redwood Addition No. 1 were on this list amounting' THE PLAN Block 2 and Lot 7 in Block 1, Wes to X21}10.18. This was referred to City Attorney Currie for a report. BE LEGAL ASPECTS JOHNS NIANSVILLE REQUEST FOR FIRE PROTECTION OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS. This be J had been referred to the City Attorney, Fire Chief and City Manager for a report. r i min This was not to be confused with mutual aid, which existed between the County and 9 i ser other nearby cities which were prepared to reciprocate for similar service rendered,;: cou i The first obligation of the Fire Department was to protect the property within the.. be City limits, which paid for the cost of such service. Legally this service might wan be extended for the protection of industries outside the City, providing sufficienti pro men and equipment were available, but at the present the City Fire Department did not ace meet the full requirements of the Board of Fire Underwriters to render adequate ser -1 fer vice inside the City and they did not think the department should be burdened with fi sec this additional responsibility. There was the possibility that local insurance rates' PROPOSED i might be increased in the event of such an arrangement and there was no practical 6 con limitation once the policy of rendering outside service was adopted. The only possible exception to the policy of not rendering fire service outside City liViits should be confined to some modified form of agreement for the protection of such I non-profit agencies as the SEQUOIA UNION HOSPITAL, which was largely supported by Redwood City taxpayers, and the right should be reserved to remove fire equipment at any time in the event it was felt to be needed for the protection of property i within the corporate limits of the City. Councilman Granger moved acceptance of recommendation by the committee and that those concerned be notified, seconded by j Councilman Spillers and carried. I THE REMOVAL OF JOHN HARTLEY RUG BUSINESS, 730 Katherine Street. Mr. Hues and ghree other! s residents in this neighborhood objected to this being taken off the agenda. It i was understood by the Council that the neighbors no longer objected and they had not; appeared at the last meeting. They thought the Council had taken action that Mr. Hartle had Hartley been given 30 days to move to a commercial area and thought they were being tolerant in waiting for the expiration of the 30 days. In their opinion there were' two violations, conducting the business in an R-1 District and the owner of the property renting it for business purposes. Councilman Spillers moved that the first motion be stricken from the minutes and the hearing reopened at the next meeting, all parties in the area and Mr. Millington to be notified seconded by Councilman Granger and carried. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED REZONING ALL THE LOTS FACING ON MIDDLEFIELD ROAD from Chestnut to Douglas that were now zoned 0,1 or C-2 to be rezoned C -1-H or I I mee PLANNING l por 4 Sze Jon s S RESOLUTI (F rea 2) on a RESOLUTI } dat F of i maj t fro i e Ave Mid sec C -2-H which would require off-streetI parking. Councilmen Spillers offered intro- i duction of ordinance, seconded by Councilman Jones and carried. THE PROPOSED. ORDINANCE.FOR. ANNEXATION'DF LAZ2ARESCHI LOT 9, HORGAN RANCH. This was on 0 ' the Cit fis wit