My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1950 to 1952 Book 23
>
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:19:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 3:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/15/1950
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�• '327 ;' <br />of business only, Motion carried on roll fall, Councilman Morgan voting No, <br />FROtd FRATERNAL 0RD8R1''OF EAGLES REGARDING CONDITION MARSHALLiI <br />S , T FRONT OF <br />BUILDING. Several chuckholes due to heavy rains constituted a hazard to i r <br />driving and walkin and asked for repair to be made .by the City. Councilman <br />Granger moved this be reffered. to proper authorities with possibility of giving <br />them temporary relief, seconded by Councilman Morgan and. carried. <br />R FROI4 CITY MANAGER REGARDING TRAFFIC STUDY AR i <br />ty LTTE TERIAL STOPS HUDSON, 'ETC. A nine <br />i! <br />�t _ day traffic count was made in March on Hopkins at Hudson,, on Brewster at Hudson <br />to on Hudson between Brewster and Hopkins .and for .every car travelling on Hudson, <br />dk . <br />t there were three on Brewster and six- on Hudson, and the Traffic Fact Finding <br />)per Committee f elt that the designation of Hudson as an arterial would be inadvisable. <br />i At the February 26th Council meeting Councilman Granger thought thereshould be <br />an arterial running north to south .and from east to west. It was further j <br />)T reported that there was one accident in 1948, ,one in 1919, five in 1950, and <br />°gan three in 1951, - no injuries. Councilman Granger, pointed out one had only to <br />live there to realize arterial .stops -were necessary and hoped any accident j'., <br />would be reffered to this committee. Councilman Spillers moved report be filed <br />the seconded by Councilman 'Royer and on roll call vote notion was lost; Councilman <br />i Royer, Spillers and Mayor Britschgi voting Yes* Councilman Jones then moved <br />;j, <br />igi that the Traffic Fact Finding Committee be notified to reopen and restudy the <br />)d problem, seconded by. Councilman Morgan, and motion carried on roll call Council- <br />men Granger, Royer, And Spillers voting No* <br />LETTER FROM HEDAHL-MARTIN RE PARKING ON JAMES BY EMPLOYEES. This was a reply to <br />request of Council and Mr. Martin stated that their superintendent, Marvin <br />'I <br />lS Conwell had been requested to instruct all their employees to hereafter, park <br />their automobiles on Fulton or Grand Streets. Letter was filed. <br />LETTER FROM CAPITAL COMPANY, 1 POjVELL STREET, SAN FRANCISCO 2, RE UNDERGROUND <br />ELECTRICAL SERVICE, BANK OF AMERICA, Thanking Council, for giving their request <br />3ITORY favorable action and postponing action for a period of sixty days, as it was j 'I <br />the banks intention to proceed with alterations to the bank, premises on or <br />Ll call about that date, signed by L. J. Hendy, Assistant Secretary» Letter filed. II <br />R-1 LETTER RE PROPOSED RESERVED SIGN BACK OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC DEPOT, from City Manager. <br />Some time ago they requested that painted area behind depot be marked with a f <br />las reserved sign and this was referred to the City Attorney office to determine <br />the Gity►s legal rights. Assistant "City Attorney C. W. Lebsack submitted legal <br />opinion that the City could make no specific arrangements for the benbEit of V <br />fA1dES <br />an indivikdual and not a class. The Southern Pacific has .control of all the <br />area referred to in memorandum from Bir. Jordan and can attach whatever conditions <br />they desire to the use of that area. Ther is no provision in the ordinances <br />Of the City or in the Vehicle• Code of the State for "Reserved" type of parking <br />E <br />Fal, designationshave Southern Pacific remove from the <br />Best solution might be to h <br />leased area that which they desire to use for their own purposes to the exclusion <br />p r , <br />. Councilman Granger moved that report be accepted, and <br />Of the general public. <br />Southern Pacific Company to be notified as to contents of letter, seconded by <br />,ted „ <br />Councilman Royer and carried. iii', <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.