|
Councilman Jones moved that this be referred to the Real 'Estate Committee to be
<br />studied, seconded by Councilman Morgan and carried.
<br />APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF USED CAR AGENCY, V. VAN BUREN, 1911 E1 Camino .Real. The fee of
<br />$25.00 had been paid. Councilman Morgan moved that the application be granted, sec-
<br />onded by Councilman Royer and carried.
<br />PROPOSED BROADWAY, MARSHALL AND VICINITY IMPROVEMENTS, also known as Broadway No. 3, The
<br />affidavit of publication was ordered filed by Mayor Rolison.
<br />PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED BROADWAY, MARSHALL AND VICINITY IMPROVEMENTS, also known as Broad-
<br />way No. 3- Mr. Henry Beeger protested the amount of assessment against his property
<br />on Chestnut and Liguori, but did not object, to the project. Attorney Wilson explained
<br />in detail the scope of the project for those interested in the audience. He explained
<br />that this was a regular hearing under Ordinance 515, that later a hearing would be
<br />held on the matter of the project itself and the assessments. The date would be set
<br />this evening at least 30 days from this date. Councilman Jones moved that the hear-
<br />ing be closed, seconded by Councilman Morgan and carried.
<br />RESOLUTION No. 889, DETERMINING TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT
<br />COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTIGATION ACT, Broadway -Marshall Street and vicinity improvement
<br />district. Councilman Morgan offered resolution and moved adoption, seconded by Coun-
<br />cilman Jones and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers noted absent.
<br />RE S 0 L U TI ON No. 889
<br />DETERMINING TO MAKE ACQUISITIONS AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITHOUT
<br />COMPLIANCE WITH. INVESTIGATION ACT
<br />BROADWAY - MARSHALL STREET AND VICINITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
<br />RESOLVED, by the Council of7the.City of Redwood City, California, that
<br />WHEREAS, on June 19, 1950, this Council adopted its Resolution of Preliminary
<br />Determination No. 888 to acquire and construct certain public improvements more
<br />particularly therein described, and did fix therein this date as the time and place
<br />when and where any and all persons interested may appear and show cause, if any they
<br />have, why the City Council should not find and determine that the public convenience
<br />and necessity require the acquisitions and improvements described and referred .to in
<br />said Resolution, without compliance .with the Special Assessment Investigation,
<br />Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931;
<br />WHEREAS, notice of the adoption of said Resolution of Preliminary Determination
<br />and of said time and place of hearing was given by the City Clerk by publication and
<br />postingfor the time and in the manner provided in said Resolution and Ordinance
<br />No. 51of said Council, as appears from affidavits on file in the office of said
<br />City Clerk;
<br />WHEREAS, one objection to the undertaking of said proceedings without first com-
<br />plying with the provisions of said Investigation Act have been filed with the City
<br />Clerk at or before the time fixed for this Yiearing by persons interested, owning or
<br />having an interest in real property within the proposed assessment district, bearing
<br />their signatures, a description of their property, and a statement of the nature of
<br />their interest therein; and
<br />WHEREAS, all persons interested having been given an opportunity to beand were
<br />fully heard, and said Council has duly considered any and all objections and protests
<br />made, and the proposed acquisitions and improvements, and t he public convenience and
<br />necessity for making same;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED and ORDERED, as follows:
<br />1. That the public convenience and necessity require the acquisitions. and im-
<br />provements described in said Resolution of Preliminary Determination.
<br />2. That any and all objections and protests made pursuant to said Resolution of
<br />Preliminary Determination be, and the same are hereby, overruled and denied.
<br />3• That the improvements and acquisitions described in said Resolution of
<br />Preliminary Determination be made under and pursuant to the provisions of Article II -A
<br />of the Redwood City Improvement Procedure Code, and that the Special Assessment
<br />Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 shall not apply to said
<br />proceedings.
<br />I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true copy of resolution adopted by the
<br />City Council of the City of Redwood City, California, at a regular meeting thereof
<br />held on the 3rd day of July, 1950, by the following vote:
<br />AYES, and in favor thereof, Councilmen: MORGAN, GRANGER, ROYER, JONES, HERKNER,
<br />37
<br />i
<br />11
<br />I
<br />
|