Laserfiche WebLink
3 Councilman Morgan expressed his satisfaction that outside contractors had submitted <br />�( ds <br />�• bi <br />S. p• yOUNGBLUTT OF FRIENDLY ACRES appeared to invite themembers <br />• Herkner of the Council to <br />M' 11Street Project Celebration", November 3rd, at 1:30 P. M. <br />3 'I <br />rl A, <br />E. <br />A. <br />F111AL MAP STULSAFT TERRACE SUBDIVISION. Mr. Nat. Landis of Land Development Company P y a P- <br />peared before the Council requesting approval of map. <br />ing A letter from the Planning Com - <br />r P. E, mission recommending approval subject to the following conditions was read by Clerk: <br />1. Five year option be furnished the City for the purchase of Lot 17, Block 12 <br />D. Miller, at a cost of $3000 per acre including improvements. <br />2. That a satisfactory agreement be furnished the City relative to the subdivider <br />putting in full improvements around the school property. <br />of Coun. <br />3, That all provisions of Ordinance No. 631 be complied with. <br />sar Letter from Mr. Stulsaft is on file in which the Land Development Company agrees to <br />y <br />inkler put up necessary bond to ensure completion of street work, also agreeing to give an f <br />option for 5 years on above lot at $3000 per acre, plus proportionate cost of im- f i <br />Lan s , <br />Lould be <br />pro vements. They quote price of $7,500 if purchased the first•year. If purchased <br />ited the <br />duting any of the four subsequent years, price will be increased by the amount of <br />h ; I <br />;ussipn, <br />carrying charges, taxes, interest etc.. Letter from Mr. Nat Landis also read in which ; <br />' F, I <br />Council- reference is made to an agreement between the Land Development Company and the Elem- <br />entary School District covering the necessary street improvements referred to the above. <br />i <br />Ln Ro er After discussion, Councilman Spillers moved approval of the recommendation of the <br />y v <br />mailable. Planning Commission, seconded by Councilman Royer. Under question, difference in <br />)rtant } price quoted by the Land Development Company and the price covered in the Planning <br />ling up CoLmLission's letter was discussed. Councilman Spillers withdrew motion with consent <br />Motion of the second, and moved, that the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission <br />material seconded by Councilman Morgan. !. <br />Mr. Landis agreed to hold the Lot 17 for six months ,to give the City time to work out <br />I p! <br />posed some arrangement regarding lot to be confirmed by letter. Councilman Granger thought <br />^itschgi +, it might be well for the Planning Commission to get the Council's views on the matter.' i t <br />Sting to Councilman Herkner moved amendment to motion to, approve the map as submitted, the E <br />matter of Lot 17 or any other lot the Planning Commission may desire to have the City <br />Purchase, seconded by Councilman Jones. Councilman Herkner explained the purpose of i <br />his motion was to speed up the matter inasmuch as the Land Development Company was <br />Willing to hold Lot 17 or any other lot for the city, the only thing holding up the <br />I, � I <br />accumu- approval was t• he price of the lot. Councilman Jones withdrew his second, and Court, t <br />Royer oyer seconded the motion in his place. Councilman Morgan thought the matter ' <br />o-waY ' <br />ncilman was an attempt to speed u something not necessary as a delay of two weeks should not <br />P P P g <br />- be a hardship. Roll call vote on amendment resulted in failure to carry, Councilmen <br />P <br />osting �i_ R09er and Royer voting "Aye". A vote on original motion to refer back to the Planning 1 <br />aring vias Commission for further study carried unanimously. <br />CI'L"y ENGINEER JAIN' S REPORT ON SEWER BIDS, CANYON ROAD. City Engineer Jain reported bid <br />{ <br />red R of Oakland Sewer Construction Company, low bidder was checked and found correct• The <br />call bid was approximately lOf higher than engineer's estimate. <br />roll- I <br />was tOLUTION No. Councilman Herkner who moved adoption, 1 <br />1155 AWARDING CONTRACT was offered by <br />for checking seconded by Councilman Morgan and carried on roll call. Councilman organ moved that <br />M <br />� a tette bidders thanking them for their interest and <br />r be written to the unsuccessful bidd 14 a <br />cooperation. Motion seconded by Councilman Jones and carried. After further dis- 1� . <br />