|
,, ;' 410
<br />r'',C; g special
<br />discussion as to the feasiblity of this annexation the possiblity of boldin
<br />election, etc., Councilman Jones moved that committee consisting of City Engineer,
<br />?+ .r
<br />City Manager and City Attorney report back at* the next Council meeting, and that a
<br />+! ',{•.,:11 i communication be addressed to the residents affected as suggested y Councilman
<br />.,. Lg:„,
<br />j'�!' : �,{j .f, .;,�{ ;; Granger, seconded by Councilman Spillers. Motion carried. Councilman Herkner stated
<br />that in his opinion the area under consideration should be spli , only that part depend-
<br />I Ii
<br />ent on the .San Carlos Sewer Service to be considered.. Mr. Armitage representing City
<br />rr'. Cit Engineer Smith of San Carlos presented plans on the proposed assessment district
<br />( j��,(,I �; :iii � f!i�; �' y g�
<br />h one side is within the City. He was of the
<br />which includes De Anza Avenue of whic
<br />opinion that the matter might be speeded up if the area were divided and the lots Which
<br />j;( j; •il:,could not be served taken into annexed area•.(
<br />E�'
<br />'" `'I;,L;;: +, ARBITRATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON DISPUTE WITH L. C:.. SMITH ON I1y1P.ROVEIVIENT JOBS will. be signed
<br />h'
<br />by Ed. Smith for the City of Redwood City and Mr. E. P. Wilsey for the L. C. Smith Co.
<br />'''recommendii follows:
<br />Alameda de las Pulgas, and Oak Avenue. - Reese Avenue Projects
<br />a f
<br />�i � ?�:r, I'�i � E;''� i { For asphaltic concrete pavement constructed beyond the limits of work as
<br />!f, j y`;; I,,; { shown on the plans, which included feathering out to meet existing pavement
<br />and construction of valley gutters, because of the - amount of hand raking and
<br />special care required in doing this type of work, we recommend payment at the
<br />;' contract price for full thickness pavement, or approximately 20� per square foot.
<br />p.,
<br />,. i,l I!V11,
<br />It was decided that the Council agreed to abide by the decision of the arbitration ci
<br />!' '+ mittee, therefore, Councilman Royer moved approval of recommendation, seconded by Coun-
<br />; cilman Spillers, and carried.
<br />Whipple Avenue Project
<br />F,or hand grading the center dividing strip and constructing 2” asphaltic
<br />concrete avement thereon vre recommend a ent @ 17-1 2, er square foot.
<br />',;
<br />yl,; L'jllj ri Councilman Spillers moved approval of recommendation, seconded by Councilman Royer
<br />f and carried.
<br />! y, i, aIt j Broadway Project
<br />For grading the area between the back of curb and property line, we
<br />recommend payment of 1-1/2¢ per square foot. Our reason for this allowance is
<br />that, while the plans indicate that this work is to be performed, no pay quan-
<br />tity is provided for in the specifications, and no provision is made in any
<br />portion of the specifications for the cost of doing this work being included
<br />�j1 I j,jin the contractors bid on other items.
<br />Inasmuch as this project was not covered in the recent discussion Councilman Spillers
<br />moved denial of this recommendation seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried. It
<br />was the opinion of the Council that the above action should not constitute a precedent.
<br />I+ Councilman Granger stated he voted to approve the recommendations because of the
<br />i,
<br />gentlemen's'agreement referred to above.
<br />ATTORNEY NORMAN MENIFEE APPEARED WITH AN APPEAL TO THE ACTIO14 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN
<br />DENYING USE PERMIT TO SAM SCH
<br />ILLACI AND LOUIS G. LINK who would construct a h4otel or
<br />Automobile Court on Lots L} to 9, Block 143 Mezesville. On motion of Councilman Spillers,
<br />seconded 'by Councilman Royer, December 3rd was set as the date of the hearing, Clerk
<br />Dodge to mail notices to residents in the area entitled to present their objections,
<br />lit;: i;. ' if any.
<br />MR. AL. SAGEHORN RETURNED TO THE MEETING WITH THE
<br />RESULTS OF THE BIDS ON THE BONDS • The
<br />following is his report;
<br />Net Interest
<br />Name
<br />of Bidder Cost of Citv
<br />4'q, �;!I
<br />Bank of Americalit
<br />1.861
<br />Blyth & Company .018
<br />American Trust Company 1 1 . 99018
<br />„r .+'•
<br />Councilman Jones offered Resolution No. 1169 and moved its adoption authorising sale
<br />
|