Laserfiche WebLink
tive <br />status <br />of <br />Motion <br />stem. Chief Lodi and James Fr <br />um oanunittee necessary information and actsrconcerninly helpful in giving the <br />r answered the many questions presented to them. g the Presents R7 <br />system and <br />FOOTH MEETING, November 15, 1951 <br />L " <br />At this meeting Mr. T. Snell, Manager of the S <br />Electric Company was present. A sc Jose Division of the Pacific <br />man and general discussion was carried on and the <br />mast' items in question were answered by Mr. Snoll. He also explained his tom ► <br />policy in detail. <br />pant' s <br />FIS IJIBE` TI G November 26, 1951 <br />Y OF SAN In further reviewing all the , acts, the committee decided to submit its report <br />and in conclusionsw of the randirecommendationthe committee has unanimously arrived at the <br />upon, fofollowingng ng <br />Council -1. It is understood that all the overhead street lighting system owned by the <br />city is under consideration for sale. This is the overhead street lighting in the <br />heart of Redwood City which includes an area bounded roughly by Alameda de las Pulgas <br />on the west, Charter Street on the east, Finger Avenue on the north and Selby Lane on <br />n motion the south. No part of the electroiier system is under consideration for sale. The <br />overhead system in Friendly Acres and new annexations is not owned by the city. <br />ones q <br />2• It is evident that the overhead street lighting property r g g pro ert owned by the city <br />r the is old and in poor condition. The majority of lighting fixtures are obsolete and out- <br />dated and practically all circuits are loaded to capacity and in some cases overloaded. <br />apply There appears to be no possibility of generally inereading lamp sizes under the <br />present system. <br />d 3 It is the opinion of the committee that there are numerous streets in the <br />at the city that are inadequately lighted; and some of the streets are important thorough- <br />fares. <br />4• This committee has been informed that if the city intended to bring the <br />SON system up to meet present day standards and requirements, it would have to be pre- <br />' pared to spend 5035,000 to $50,000 for this purpose. In some instances, due to com- <br />was plications arising from dual ownership of lines and poles and inadequate space, it <br />would not be possible in any way to renovise portions of the system unless extensive <br />Morgan additional capital expenditures were made. <br />5• The present electrical department maintained by the city would have to be <br />increased materially in manpower and equipment if it were committed to any construction <br />program. At present only the minimum maintenance work is performed on the overhead <br />street lighting system. Practically all necessary construction work is already per- <br />formed by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company and billed to the city on a time and <br />r <br />material (if furnished) basis. <br />6. If the system were taken over by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company the rates <br />at which the city buys electric power for the street lighting would increase for that <br />portion of the system sold. However, all costs and responsibility of maintaing and <br />Improving the system would then be assumed by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company <br />entirely and the city would be relieved of this expense and responsilility. The': <br />Herkner, following is submitted to show the approximate increases and reductions to the elec- <br />e rk trical budget; <br />y C B. For the present lighting, if acquired by the Pacific Gas <br />& Electric Company, the annual charge for electricity, <br />Lodi, maintenance, globes, improvements and other services <br />would be approximately <br />p20,417.00 <br />and <br />The present cost to the city of electrical energy only is 69670.00 <br />To the above should be added maintenance costs such as <br />f this labor, globes, materials and equipment, compensation <br />insurance, pensions, depreciation, administrative and <br />general expense incurred by the city which is estimated 13000.00 <br />at <br />TOTAL $19,670.00 <br />y <br />the <br />present <br />ison Also, consideration should be given to the fact that this property if <br />and owned tax <br />by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company would be placed on the city <br />rolls and taxes collected thereon. Also, the Pacific Gas & Electric Company now <br />bills the cit aroun ��2 000 a year for services which would be largely <br />ated so in reality thetotalcost may be less than at present, saying nothing of <br />ieir the nuisance value to all concerned and besides, the Pacific Gas & Llectri'c <br />City. Company is equipped to give better service. <br />tric7• The committee is of the opinion that the city is not now in a positions stem <br />is not likely to be in the future$ to expend the necessary time and expense nn. <br />Ld by Which is already badly in need of replacement* <br />the committee <br />8. If the city were to sell to the Pacific Gas & Electric Company begin to <br />has been assured that the Pacific Gas & Electric Company will immediately a survey of <br />bring the system a to meet company standards. This would include making <br />all circuits for voltage and current and making necessary changes on any circuit that <br />p to standard. Lamps would be changed by group lots instead of eneher- <br />did at <br />not test u g <br />a time as they burn out. Old fixtures would be replaced with a new modea11t100 candle - <br />ever 100 candle ower lamps were changed to 250 candlepower. Eventually <br />�ician power lamps should be changed as this lamp is considered too small for modern street <br />ling <br />S; <br />I <br />,f <br />! <br />i <br />I' <br />I <br />i <br />l <br />•' <br />f <br />Fil <br />I <br />_1 <br />