Laserfiche WebLink
418 <br />Improvements would be made by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company <br />by the City <br />lighting, Council. <br />the system as found necessary and requested <br />to any part of <br />9 The committee has reviewed the inventory and has discussed the price <br />to the city, and from the <br />:'' ! •' <br />offered by the Pacific Gas &Electric Company data <br />!, <br />available it appears to be a fair price. <br />the above facts, it is the committee's observation and befief <br />j'that <br />In view of <br />the street lighting would be considerably improved if the overhead <br />;'' <br />city's <br />street lighting system was acquired, maintained and operated by the Pacific Gas <br />in the sale would be <br />I'I' <br />&Electric Company and that early action consummating <br />depreciation and obsolescence write-downs in the <br />desirable to prevent further <br />values. <br />Respectfully submitted: <br />HENRY P. 'TARRATT, Chairman <br />C UHLENBERG <br />!IIS; a <br />J. ELiL'IER MORRISH <br />�, I'' •'ill ll��• <br />' <br />pl i II pI1• , <br />��A <br />•, <br />1',�I'; '',, Y,y 'I.4, <br />CHARLES NiITCIIELL <br />ALFRED G. PLAEHN <br />' <br />FRED A. SCHMITZ <br />Councilman Morgan moved that the report be accepted and a letter of thanks written to <br />the members of this committee thanking them all for an excellent job well done, <br />seconded by Councilman Jones and carried. <br />0 <br />Councilman Iti4organ moved that the Mayor appoint a committee to check into this report <br />and go into all details, seconded by Councilman Granger. Councilman Granger stated <br />his opinion that the appraisal as submitted by the Pacific Gas & Electric Company <br />did not include late improvements to the system stating the possible necessity of <br />the Pacific Gas & Electric Company to bring the appraisal up to date. Motion carried. <br />CONiMITTEE REPORT ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF' DE ANZA TO SAN CARLOS. The committee consisting <br />of City Engineer, City Manager, and City Attorney reported that after study they could <br />see no objection to the 11disincorporation" of the properties now owned by Mr. Tofanelli <br />namely the NLY 130.4' of Lots 1 and 2, and all of Lots 3 and 4, Eaton Avenue Villas <br />which cannot now be served by Redwood City Sewers. However they were of the belief <br />that the other property owners on Eaton Villa Place should be considered and that con- <br />ditions be established whereby these lots cannot be resubdivided into smaller lots <br />than the rest of those in this tract. Mr. Wm. Hart and Mrs. John Morgan, owners of <br />property on the west side of Eaton Villa Place were present and spoke in their own be- <br />half. Their thought was that if Eaton Avenue Villas and Eaton Villa Place were annexed <br />to San Carlos there might be a possibility of these lots being subdivided into small <br />lots which would result in several small backyards backing up to their large parcels, <br />Councilman Royer moved that City Manager Rolison check into this matter further and <br />inquire as to the possibility of the City of San Carlos serving this area under agree- <br />ment, the property to remain within the City of Redwood City limits. Motion seconded <br />by Councilman Jones and carried. <br />MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19th regular meeting were approved as mailed on motion of Councilman <br />Royer, seconded by Councilman Herkner subject to the following correction: Under <br />"Planning Commission recommending approval of application of E. Tofanelli for resub- <br />