My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 PARTIAL BOOK 25
>
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:56:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 4:52:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/1/1955
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
415 <br />STORM DRAINAGE AND TIDE GATE STRUCTURE. City Engineer Jain gave a report to the Council <br />covering the entire program which has been under consideration for the past several <br />years. Mr. Paul Adamson had been engaged to complete drainage studies including tide <br />gate structure, tide gate should be designed by a licenses engineer and built by a <br />licensed, bonded contractor. The City Engineer called attention to the fact that tide <br />gate structure should be eventually installed to protect the part of the creek which <br />has been covered to keep tide water out. He called attention to the fact that such a <br />tide gate would increase flood hazard by raising the head of the flood and was desir- <br />able only as a method of keeping the creek clean. He also commented on Mr. Sproul's <br />I <br />offer to save the City $40.,000 whereas the estimate to drain the tidegate structure <br />was only 45,000. <br />Mayor Herkner discussed the proposed parking lot #3 as well as #2 calling attention to <br />the fact that it was the desire of the Council to go ahead with the complete program <br />j within the coming year, it being the intention to straighten creek and cover to Bradford <br />Street bridge. It was suggested that this matter be turned over to the Parking District <br />Committee consisting of Councilmen Jones, Britschgi and Stout who will study the matter <br />and report their findings and recommendations. Councilman Royer moved that the parking <br />lot committee commence working on proposed parking lot #3 as well as #2, seconded by <br />Councilman Jones and carried. Councilman Royer moved that a letter be addressed to <br />Mr. Sproul explaining that his proposition does not conform to the City's policy and <br />the terms of the City's Charter, also to thank Mr. Sproul for his interest in the matter. <br />Motion seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. Mr. Sproul's communication was <br />ordered filed. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS, COUNCIL AND DEPARTMENT HEADS <br />Councilman Stout called attention to the lots near the corner of James and Iris Streets <br />on which unsightly weeds were growing. Matter was referred to the City Manager, <br />Councilman Stout also called attention to the lot to be used as a parking lot recently <br />granted to the Redeemer Lutheran Church. The Councilman thought the lot could be made <br />to look more presentable and the City Manager was requested to check into this matter <br />also. <br />Councilman Stout suggested the possibility of a Council Committee to work out a program of <br />visitation to new industries and business in the interest of public relations. In his <br />opinion, this Committee would prove valuable to work in conformance with the Chamber of <br />Commerce in their efforts to bring new business into the City. Councilman Stout then <br />!I moved that the matter be turned over to the Chamber of Commerce Committee to consult <br />awith that organization and bring back a report in two or three weeks, seconded by <br />Councilman Britschgi and carried., <br />Councilman Granger requested information as to the present status of the Southern Pacific <br />property suggesting that they be notified finally as to deadline, failure to hear from <br />them to result in original intention of rezoning the property. City Attorney will <br />check into this matter. <br />Councilman Granger commented on the fact that the Planning Commission recommendations did not <br />I� <br />d contain sufficient information nor were there sufficient maps provided for the Council's <br />edification. Mayor Herkner stated that hereafter, the matters would not be placed on <br />the Council Agenda unlesssketches were provided. Councilman Stout then moved that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.