My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 PARTIAL BOOK 25
>
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:56:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 4:52:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/1/1955
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. c <br />444 <br />5. "If such a person could be employed by the school district, could <br />such a person arrect a person for violation of the signals of the <br />school safety patrol when such violation was committed in his <br />presence?" <br />Answer: Yes, but his authority to make such an arrect would be limited <br />to the authority of any other private person and would not be derived . <br />fpom his employment as employee of the school district. Section 837 (1) <br />of the Penal Code provides that a private person may arrest another <br />"For a public offense commited or attempted in his presence." Section <br />16438 of the Education {Code provides that any person who disregards any <br />traffic signal or direction given by a member of a school safety patrol <br />shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and is subject tothe penalties pro- <br />vided by Section 762 of the Vehicle Code. "Public offense", which is <br />defined by Section 15 of the Penal Code,. includes a misdemeanor committed <br />in his presence, under Section 837 (1) of the Penal Code, the affirmative <br />answer to question number 5 would apply to any private person, and the fact <br />that the person under discussion was an employee of the school district <br />would in no way increase his authority to make such arrest, nor would he <br />be clothed with any additional immunities or charged with any additional <br />liabilities or duties by reason of his employment in making such an arrest. <br />Very truly yours, <br />LOUIS B. DEMATTEIS, District Attorney <br />By: Lyle R. Edson, Deputy <br />This was followed by general discussion after which the motion carried. <br />FURTHER'DISCUSSION REGARDING GILBERT UPHOLSTERY SHOP, 130 CERRITO AVENUE. DISTRICT <br />ATTORNEY REPORT. The report stated that a review of their file showed that the <br />question of the Gilbert's Upholstery -Shop being a possible violation of the County <br />Zoning Ordinance arose in early 1951 and inspections, investigations and discussions <br />between this office, the Planning Commission Staff and the Attorneys for the Gilberts <br />were carried on for many months upon promises that the Giblberts would accomplish <br />certain modifications to their physical facilities and their method of doing <br />business which would.sati:fy the home occupation provision in the County Zoning <br />Ordinance. Photgraphs, inspection reports and office notes and summaries are <br />included in our file in this matter. Inasmuch as the matter is closed as far as <br />the County is concerned, because of the annexation to Redwood City having been <br />effected, he had no objection to making the entire file in this office available <br />to your City for its perusual and said file is enclosed herewith. <br />Councilman Britschgi moved that the file be made a part of the record and filed, <br />seconded by Councilman Granger and carried. This was followed by general discussion <br />and it was decided that the matter would be placed on the agenda for two weeks and <br />would be settled at a study meeting prior to the Council meeting. <br />CITY ENGINEER REGARDING PETITION FOR SANITARY SEWERS UPLAND ROAD, HIGHLANDS TTERRITORY <br />N0. 4. It is the understanding of the Engineering Department, based upon conditions <br />required for improvements in Highlands Territory No. 1 and 2, that water mains must <br />be constructed at the same time as a part of the assessment district. The property <br />owners in the undedicated portion of Upland. Road, now petitioning for sewers, are <br />served by a very old 2 -inch wrought iron water line installed by the original <br />developer of the Johnson Tract, which extends along Upland Road and connects with <br />another very old 4- inch wrought iron water main near the Latter Day Saints Church <br />on Cordilleras Road. Due to the fact that this is a very old, deteriorated, and <br />inadequate main, he feels that the entire main to Cordilleras Road should be <br />reconstructed at such time as the remainder of Upland Road becomes annexed to the <br />City. For the present, the portion of this main, fronting on the property now <br />being annexed, should be constructed at the same time as the sewer, which will <br />result in almost double the assessment for sewers only. <br />'ta <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.