|
142
<br />0
<br />■.;
<br />V. Spillers noted absent. Also present were City Manager E. A. Rolison, City Attorney C. B. Currie, City
<br />Engineer Glenn M. Jain, Water Superintendent H. L. Winter, Building Inspector S. H. Kreiss, Acting Police
<br />Chief Theodore Moudakas, Fire Chief J. L. Lodi, Assistant to City Manager L. A. Kimball,, Park and Recreation
<br />Commissioner Gerry Verssen and Account—Clerk Vivian Holmquist.
<br />Councilman Britschgi moved that the minutes of April 16th, 23rd and the 30th be approved as mailed, seconded by
<br />Councilman Stout. Councilman Weiss stated that he had some corrections he would like to make. The following �±
<br />are his corrections.
<br />April 16th minutes, page 11 last paragraph reads as follows: Councilman Weiss stated that though the vote
<br />was 5 to 2 he was of the opinion that the vote should be unanimous, etc. Councilman Weiss asked that it
<br />be changed to: he was of the opinion that the vote should, in the interest of harmoney, be unanimous, etc.
<br />April 16th minutes, page 3, second paragraph under public hearing, rezone property Oak Knoll and Canyon
<br />Road From UUu to C -1—H. City Attorney Currie stated that any proper that comes into the City immediately
<br />3 goes into an U District and then if the Planning Commission desires they may recommend the rezoning of
<br />the property in the usual manner. CouncilrAan Weiss asked that this be changed to: City Attorney Currie
<br />stated that any,property that comes into the City immediately goes into an U District and no promises can
<br />validly be made and then if the Planning Commission desires they may later recommend the rezoning, etc.
<br />City Engineer Jain stated that the motion was not correct in rezoning all of the lots, it should just be a
<br />portion of the lots. The Clerk stated that the letter from the Planning Commission indicated all.of the
<br />lots, nbt�a portion -were recommended: ltiwas'decided,to leave the minutes read all the lots and the City
<br />Attorney was asked to check into the matter before drawing up the ordinance.
<br />April 23rd minutes, third paragraph. Councilman Weiss was of the opinion that this should be held over
<br />-for 30 days, etc. He asked that this be changed to: Councilman Weiss was of the opinion thatthis should
<br />be held over for 30 to 60 days, etc.
<br />April 30th minutes, second paragraph, page 2. Canyon Road should be corrected to Canada Road. r
<br />April 30th minutes, first, paragraph, page -3- Councilman Weiss adked that the following be added after
<br />the sentence regarding $75.Op annexation fee; Are the people aware that they are subject to the $75.00
<br />annexation fee per lot?
<br />The Clerk was asked to make the chnages as noted. The motion carried. There was general discussion
<br />in regard to how corrections should be noted and brought to the attention of the Council.
<br />PUBLIC HEARING, OPEN BIDS, SALE OF POPLAR—HESS—EBENER BONDS. The following bids were received:
<br />Blair & Co., Incorporated
<br />L. H. Easterling & Co.
<br />The sum of 98.01% of par plus accrued interest to date of delivery for bonds bearing a coupon
<br />rate of AV.,
<br />Stone & Youngberg
<br />The sum of 97.55% of the principal amount thereof, plus accured interest to date of delivery,
<br />for such bonds to bear interest at the rate of 52% per annum.
<br />City Attorney Currie was adked to check the bids and report back later in the meeting.
<br />PUBLIC HEARING, RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO MAKE CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS, PARKING DISTRICT 13 LOT IV.
<br />Affidavit of publication was ordered filed. This was follovred by a short discussion after which Council—
<br />man Herkner offered RESOLUTION 2030 BEING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO MAKE CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS, I I
<br />PARKING DISTRICT 1, LOT IV and moved its adoption, seconded.by Councilman Britschgi and carried on roll � J
<br />call with Councilman Spillers being noted absent.
<br />PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED OFFICIAL PLAN LINES, BEECH STREET FROM HILTON TO STAi19AUGH. There were no written
<br />protests. Mr. James O'Connor, representing his father who lives at 427 Stambaugh Street, stated that
<br />this would take a strip i5t x 2001 from their property and since Beech Street would only go as far as
<br />the railroad t4acks he couldntt see any reason why they wanted to extend the street. He suggested Cedar
<br />1.
<br />
|