BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17

Browse Search

i posting were ordered filed. Mrs. 144rgory thirkell, 3516\GlemvoDo4ld Thirkell, 3516 Glenwood Avenue, Lowell Brovm,,362Avenin, Mrs Ruhl, 600 Block Upton Street, Bob Chambers, Avenue,�drs. Harris, ovmer o£ property in Emerald Lake, discussion\.with the majority of the people speaking against G1e in the assessment district. Councilman Spillers moved that the 141 Avenue, Mr.,Miller, Harding Avenue, .Avenue., Mr. McCarthy, 3509 Glenwood ,00d Avenue, Danny Silva, 3517 Glenwood on the question. There was a very lengthy od Avenue and Canyon Road being included uuic hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman Granger and carried. Councilman Spillers offered Resolution of public convenience and necess t, by Councilman Granger. This was followed by discussion as to what effect and moved its adoption, seconded assessment district, wh ther or not it would overrule all protests, whether presented and read protea ' g the inclusionof Glenwood and Canyon Road would Resolution would have on the not the petition which was over to the next and all succeeding public hearings o be overruled by adoption of this resolution. The ty Attorney stated that 6/7th vote was required to pas this resolution. The motion lost on roll call with Councilman Stout and Weiss voting No and'Councilman Br\the being noted absent. The City Attorney stated that thetwo steps which the Council could decide upon. The Council could .go through with the proceedings oept Limitation Act which would increase the overa cost of the ''.- assessment proceedings or they could star\no r again vrith another Resolution of Prelimi\arytion. Councilman Spillers spoke on subjeated that he was of the opinion that the C call for the bids and then if the bids weat they rented then the Council could.posibly s\are of the cost and proceed with the prhis was followed by discussion as to what the i Determina- 1 should ay a e Council would be. Councilman Stout explained-. he voted no and he also stated his feelings on this atter. Counci n Herkner objected to the City paying for pro%hacost ings and then not having the project go He wanted to know approximately how much this project the -City at the present time. City Jain stated hat the cost is approximately $15,000. City Attorney urrie again explained what proceedings the Cou request a new res lution amending the plans and eliminate the could take. He said the Council could in question. This was followed by discussion after whi h Councilman Stout moved that the City Engineeb�amend the plans and specifications to eliminate this area question, seconded by Councilman Weiss. Co Gilman Herkner wanted to know what the effect of -the elimina ion of this area would have on the whole proje t. Fire Chief Lodi was of the opinion that the City should,, contact the Fire Underwriters and show them thq maps and have their recommend— ation on this before the Counc\if*t official action. Councilman Herkner m e an amendment to the motion I to await the decision of the FUnderwriters as suggested by the Fire Chief an to have a study meeting to discuss this matter furtherby Councilman Granger who wanted a study \Clerk a survey. Councilman Spillersvranted to know would be possible to have an answer in onee Chief Lodi was requested to see if this wo ible and the motion carried. COUNCILMAN WEISS'S REPORT REGARDINGNSI This was set for a study meeting.FIRE MARSHAL REPORT REGARDING VET ICE BU DING, WARREN AND STANDISH STREETS. read the following report submitted by the Fire Marshal: Minutes of the Regular Meeting Redwood City Council Ialay 7, 1956, 8:00 P. IA. Invocation was lead by Reverend Ronald H. White, Pastor First Methodist Church. Fire Chief Lodi presented Mayor Royer with a handsome gavel, compliments of Chamber of Commerce of Eureka and Humbalt County. ON ROLL CALL the following members were noted present: Councilmen Carl A. Britschgi, Floyd D. Granger, Sidney D. Herkner, Hiram S. Stout, Louis Weiss, Mayor William H. Royer and City Clerk R. S. Dodge. Councilman Robert