My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U <br />11 <br />229 <br />PERSONAL APPEARANCE, S. & J. MILLER REGARDING REPLACEMENT OF SIDEWALK AT 322 CHESTNUT STREET. Mr. Miller <br />stated that he had received a sidewalk notice to have the sidewalk fixed within 10 days. He stated that <br />some years ago he had contacted the City and asked to be allowed to take a tree down that was -beginning to <br />raise the sidewalk. He was told at that time that the tree could not be taken down. A few weeks ago the <br />City took this tree down, after the City had been sued by someone who fell on the sidewalk. Mr. Miller <br />stated that he will fix the sidewalk but he wants to know just how much sidewalk the city wants to be fixed <br />and what specifications should be used. <br />Senior Engineer Moen stated that he would check into this matter with Mr. Miller. He stated that he had <br />checked this sidewalk and stated that there is a large piece of sidewalk that is lower than the curb and <br />:The Mayor appointed Councilmen Weiss and Stout to act as a committee to check into the records on this matter. <br />Councilman Granger stated that Mrs Millar should be given the necessary information to fix his sidewalk. <br />City Attorney Currie stated that Mr. Miller and Mrs. Jamieson's appearance should be treated as an appeal. <br />Councilman Spillers moved to continue the nearing for thirty days, and set the first of September for the <br />hearing, seconded by Councilman Granger. Councilman Weiss wanted to know if this committee was limited to <br />just these two pieces of property. The Mayor stated they were to check the whole block. .The motion carried. <br />PERSONAL APPEARANCE, MR. JAMES MILLER, 2432 HARDING AVENUE, regarding standing water in front of his property. <br />He stated that there was a low spot in front of his property and all the water settled there. When the <br />people wash their cars, all the water runs down the hill and settles in front of his property. Senior <br />Engineer Moen stated that the City could grade the street, however, the condition was cased by Mr. Miller's <br />drveway blocking the flow of water. Councilman Granger was of the opinion that the Engineering Department <br />should take a look At this and try to help and give some relief to this man. Councilman Granger so moved, <br />seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />CITY ATTORNEY REPORT REGARDING AGREEMENT COVERING TRANSFER CF WATER METER FROM 4152 TO 41-60 JEFFERSON AVENUE <br />POSSIBILITY OF RECORDING SUCH AGREEMENT. City Attorney stated that it was his opinion that the recording <br />of such an agreement was useless on.this type of agreement because you couldn't put conditions on this type <br />I <br />to transfer. They could draw up acme sort of agreement. The recording of such an agreement would do no <br />harm but would call attention to a condition of the agreement on record for the benefit of a prospective <br />buyer. Councilman Granger stated that they should protect the future property owners in case of any future <br />sale of the property. Councilman Spillers was of the opinion that the condition is good only for the time <br />being because if the well runs dry the City will propbably have to grant a water meter to the original <br />residence. <br />CITY ENGINEER REPORT ON REQUEST TO ABANDON UTILITY EASEMENT ON LOT 12, BLOCK 16, WOODSIDE TERRACE N0. 4 (G. E. <br />HARRISON, 2054 Washington). In his report, City Engineer Jain stated that the easement requested to be <br />abandoned is only a small portion of a public utility easement, 10 feet in width's extending approximately <br />900 feet through the Woodside Terrace Subdivisions. Although this easement is not now being used, they are <br />relunctant to recommend abandonment of any easement which might have an ultimate use with further development <br />of the City. It was his recommendation, rather thanabandon a small portion of this easement, that Mr. & <br />Mrs. Harrison be given permission to construct a car port extending to within two feet of the side property <br />line and five feet from the rear property line of the lot in question. Any such approval should be subject <br />to the property owners obtaining a written statement from the P. G. & E. and P. T. & T., advising that they <br />have no objection to the construction of a car port over a portion of this easement. At such time as <br />there is quite a bit ofsidewalkthat <br />should be fixed. Mr. Inex Carolla stated that <br />she had pictures of <br />the area sharing that they had cement <br />driveways before the street was repaired. The <br />Mayor asked if the <br />people would object to having him appoint a couple of Councilmen to make a study and <br />cheek with property <br />owners. Mrs. Carolla stated that she <br />represented her mother, Mrs. Dolly Jamieson, and were objecting to <br />.repairing the sidewalk. <br />:The Mayor appointed Councilmen Weiss and Stout to act as a committee to check into the records on this matter. <br />Councilman Granger stated that Mrs Millar should be given the necessary information to fix his sidewalk. <br />City Attorney Currie stated that Mr. Miller and Mrs. Jamieson's appearance should be treated as an appeal. <br />Councilman Spillers moved to continue the nearing for thirty days, and set the first of September for the <br />hearing, seconded by Councilman Granger. Councilman Weiss wanted to know if this committee was limited to <br />just these two pieces of property. The Mayor stated they were to check the whole block. .The motion carried. <br />PERSONAL APPEARANCE, MR. JAMES MILLER, 2432 HARDING AVENUE, regarding standing water in front of his property. <br />He stated that there was a low spot in front of his property and all the water settled there. When the <br />people wash their cars, all the water runs down the hill and settles in front of his property. Senior <br />Engineer Moen stated that the City could grade the street, however, the condition was cased by Mr. Miller's <br />drveway blocking the flow of water. Councilman Granger was of the opinion that the Engineering Department <br />should take a look At this and try to help and give some relief to this man. Councilman Granger so moved, <br />seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />CITY ATTORNEY REPORT REGARDING AGREEMENT COVERING TRANSFER CF WATER METER FROM 4152 TO 41-60 JEFFERSON AVENUE <br />POSSIBILITY OF RECORDING SUCH AGREEMENT. City Attorney stated that it was his opinion that the recording <br />of such an agreement was useless on.this type of agreement because you couldn't put conditions on this type <br />I <br />to transfer. They could draw up acme sort of agreement. The recording of such an agreement would do no <br />harm but would call attention to a condition of the agreement on record for the benefit of a prospective <br />buyer. Councilman Granger stated that they should protect the future property owners in case of any future <br />sale of the property. Councilman Spillers was of the opinion that the condition is good only for the time <br />being because if the well runs dry the City will propbably have to grant a water meter to the original <br />residence. <br />CITY ENGINEER REPORT ON REQUEST TO ABANDON UTILITY EASEMENT ON LOT 12, BLOCK 16, WOODSIDE TERRACE N0. 4 (G. E. <br />HARRISON, 2054 Washington). In his report, City Engineer Jain stated that the easement requested to be <br />abandoned is only a small portion of a public utility easement, 10 feet in width's extending approximately <br />900 feet through the Woodside Terrace Subdivisions. Although this easement is not now being used, they are <br />relunctant to recommend abandonment of any easement which might have an ultimate use with further development <br />of the City. It was his recommendation, rather thanabandon a small portion of this easement, that Mr. & <br />Mrs. Harrison be given permission to construct a car port extending to within two feet of the side property <br />line and five feet from the rear property line of the lot in question. Any such approval should be subject <br />to the property owners obtaining a written statement from the P. G. & E. and P. T. & T., advising that they <br />have no objection to the construction of a car port over a portion of this easement. At such time as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.