Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />0' <br />r <br />277 <br />CONTINUATION OF HEARING, PROPOSED REZONING OF DALE STUART PROPERTY. P,lr. Stuart read a very long prepared <br />statement. He stated that rather than loose t1le zoning altogether Ile would make some effort to comply to <br />the 18 units. The question was raised as to i^rhether or not Mr. Stuart would be willing to, on his owns <br />I <br />record a deed of restriction. Par. Stuart stated that he would not do this and further he did not think <br />it would be legal. This vas followed by further discussion. Councilman Granger moved that the public <br />hearing bp, closed, seconded by Councilman Stout, P.4r. Haney spoke on the question. The motion carried. <br />Councilman Weiss read the following prepared statement: <br />Iteiq # 2 - September ll, 1956. t <br />I am by no means desireous of raising further controversy on this matter but I must state <br />that I was present at the planning commission meeting when this matter was considered. <br />JwTy understanding was that the motion to rezone in accordance with our referrals which <br />indicated our intention to rezones lost as a result of failure to obtain the necessary "Aye" <br />gotess and the the chair stated tk�at it would thus be submitted to the council without <br />recommendations and that naturally is the logical approach under the circumstances. <br />This matter has been explored on a number of accasionss both by the Planning Commission <br />1 and the Council; the facts should be pretty evident to us all. <br />l{ The Planning Commission on every occasion, except for its presently undecisive actions <br />has indicated its thanking that the property should for the present remain R-2. Further <br />the Council, for all practical purposes has clearly indicated by adoption of a motion by a five to <br />two vote on July 23, that it is its intention to rezone this property back to R -2s and the <br />Mayor clearly stated for the benefit*of the audience and Mr. Stuart that such action decided <br />what..the intention of the council was. <br />Under the circumstances I see no alternative but to move that the City Attorney be <br />instructed to prepare an ordinance for introduction rezoning said property from R-3 to R -2s <br />all in accordance with our previously announced intention as expressed on July 23, 1956s <br />seconded by Councilman Stout and carried on roil call, Mayor Royer voting No and Councilman <br />Britschgi and Spillers being noted absent. It was explained to Mr. Stuart the ordinance <br />would be introduced at the September 17th meeting and adopted at the October 1st meeting, <br />to be effective 30 days latsr. <br />PERSONAL APPEARANCE, KENNETH MILLE, 260 G Street, regarding Golf Practise Range causing hazard an area. An <br />appeal made by residents and citizens of uG" Street for assistance in relieving them of ever present dangers <br />k arising from the Golf Practice Range was presented. The Mayor asked that since this was in San Carlos the <br />City Manager's office contact theSan-goodRange to see if they could take care of this matter. The Clerk <br />was asked to read the letter. Councilman Stout asked the jurisdiction of the Police Department. He <br />believes that the City should take immediate.steps even if it means that the Police Chief is requested to <br />contact the San Carlos Police Chief in an attempt to put an immediate stop until such time as this can be <br />fixed. Police CPieief Faulstich stated that the offence.takes place in San Carlos and the damage takes <br />place in Redwood City. City Attorney Costello suggested that same official in Redwood City contact some <br />official in San Carlos on this matter and ask that they take measures to correct same. This is a civil <br />matter.„ This was followed by discussion. <br />Councilman Granger moved that the proper authorities in San Carlos be furnished with a copy of this letter <br />or the original letter in order to get i4maediate relief in Redwood Citys seconded by Councilman Herkner <br />and carried. Councilman Weiss moved that the.City Managerts of'ice follow through and report back next weeks <br />I <br />seconded by Councilman Granger and carried. <br />s <br />AUTHORIZE CITY ATTORNEY TO AD'1END CONTRACT ON DREDGING OF, THE YACHT HARBOR. City Engineer Jain stated that there <br />is a number of large pieces of concrete which can not be moved by the dredge and it is causing a number of <br />delays. The specifications do not cover this exactly. He further stated that the Company would allow the <br />i . <br />I,. City one day or they would charge the City $105,.00 an hour for anything over and above the one day. City <br />Engineer Jain recommended to pay $105.00 per hour for each hour of such delay over and above an average of <br />z hour per 8 hour working shift. Fractional hours will be .appropriately prorated. Councilman Weiss asked <br />about the rate. City Engineer Jain stated that 7 men work on a shift. Councilman Weiss moved that the <br />City Attorney be authorized to draw up the necessary resolution to permit the amendment to the contracts <br />seconded by Councilman Herlmer who asked.that if this condition gets relatively worse and if they can find <br />PRr. Jain statedrlthat they, <br />that certain areas are such that they can be. lefts out that they be by-passed.. <br />i <br />