My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
419 <br />Councilman Herkner. City Manager Rolison spoke on the subject and stated that it wasn't their intention <br />to botain the $35,000 by raising the installation charges. He only mentioned the $35,000 to show that the <br />Water Department funds were insufficient to continue to meet all oblegations. The motion -carried. The <br />Mayor set this for a study meeting on March.20th. <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT ON PROPOSED REVISION OF CIVIL DEFENSE ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION. The City Manager reported <br />that in order to comply with the Council's request that his <br />office implement <br />the first <br />four pages <br />of the <br />California Disaster Office survey of the Redwood City civil <br />defense system, <br />it will be <br />necessary <br />to amend <br />Ordinance 665 and Resolution 1037. He only mentioned the $35,000 to show that the Water Department funds were <br />insufficient to continue to meet all obligations. The motion carried. The Mayor set this for a study <br />meeting on March 20th. <br />Councilman Spillers'moved acceptance of -the -City Manager's recommendation. Councilman Grahger,asked-what <br />Ordinance,665 and Res8luti6h 1037''were.-'Mry Kimball'.stated that Ordinance.6..65:,established•CiviELzan:De4ense <br />6xgaiiizationiand Res6Tutiom=1037 set tp.the.'form of. .Civil Defense Qrganization establishing designation of <br />6fficers<and.emplo'yees ,'.The fact was brought out that these changes were recommended by -the State Disaster <br />Office, Councilman Granger did not feel th-it the Council had to accept all the recommendation of the State. <br />This was followed by discussion in regard to who bhould be appointed to the Defense Council. Councilman <br />Granger wanted to be sure that the old Defense Council was not being obolished and the same people serving on <br />the Council could be reactivated if possible. The motion lost for lack of a second. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that this matter be set for a study meeting and the City Manager's report be <br />received, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. The Mayor set the study meeting for March 20th. <br />COUNCILMAN HERKNER REPORT ON OFF-STREET PARKING, 2600 BROADWAY. C6imcilman Herkner stated that he, Councilman <br />Weymouth and Stout met with Larry Wise in connection with the parking Survey. A new survey is necessary <br />because they const use theeoriginal parking lot survey. They must revise the survey and make an enlarged <br />map and resurvey the parking turnover, necessary to project the assessed valuation over the next 10 or 20 <br />years, valuate facts and justify financing and make a prospectus. Councilman Herkner stated that he met <br />with thg people today and gave them the above mentioned facts. He told the group that the Council was <br />behind this and the people asked for one additional week to make contact with the property owners. They <br />will come in with a request next Monday night. Councilman Herkner moved that this matter be carried on <br />the agenda for one week, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. The Clerk was asked to advise Mr. <br />Spangler of the action taken tonight. <br />INTRODUCE ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 813 TO REDEFINE THE OBJECTIVES, POVTERS AND DUTIES OF THE VETERANS MEMORIAL <br />COMMISSION. The City Attorney read the title of the ordinance and outlined, in brie£, the contents of the <br />ordinance. This ordinance is in keeping with the State laws and in accordance with the opinions of the <br />Attorney General. Councilman Spillers offered introduction of the ordinance, seconded by Councilman Herkner. <br />Councilman Weiss asked if this ordinance gave the primary outline of the use of the building. The City <br />Attorney stated that Councilman Weiss statement was.true and that in addition the ordinance will strengthen <br />previous Council action. Councilman Granger asked that the Council instruct the Commission that they <br />cgnsider as rule number one that the organizations shall be recognized as the State definition -of Veteran <br />Organizations. He wants to be sure that there will be no subversive groups allowed to use the building. <br />The. City Attorney recommended that they request the Veterans Memorail Commission to ask that all veteran's <br />groups file with the Commission an affidavit that they are not subversive and that all other users must <br />also file such an affidavit. The City Attorney recommended that this not be made a part of the ordinance but <br />should be considered under rules and regulations. The motion carried. <br />Councilman Granger moved that the City Clerk notify the Commission of the Council's remarks in regard to <br />organizations filing a loyalty oath, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.