|
4 552 c"-; V
<br />from Mrs. Smith within 24 hours. The motion was seconded by Councilman Weymouth. This was followed
<br />by discussion after which the motion carried on roll call with Councilmen Granger and Weiss voting N0.
<br />Councilman Spillers said he would get the letter.
<br />Councilman Stout moved that if the letter is not received within 24 hours that the City Engineer
<br />proceed as the committee recommended, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried on roll call, Councilmn
<br />Spillers voting N0, Councilman Spillers wanted to know,who had the right to the fill. Councilman =(
<br />Spillers asked that consideration be given to the advisibility of notifying the property owners the
<br />last ten days of their extension. This was referred to the Sidewalk Committee.
<br />Councilman Stout moved that the property owners (the Smiths) advise the City-viien they plan to do any
<br />construction and when they plan to put in the sidewalk on Finger Avenue and also ask for an extension
<br />of time, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried.
<br />Notice Number 358, dated March 14, 1957, portion Block 31 Hancock Addition, SSP 62.5 feet on Elm and L!
<br />Beech and 259.3 feet on Lathrop Street, J. S. Heath and Iva L. Heath -.Committee recommendation:
<br />Extension to May 20, 1957. Councilman Weymouth moved approval of the Committee's recommendation,
<br />seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried. ,
<br />Notice Number 362, dated March 14, 1957, portion Block 3, Hancock Addition, 106 feet on Main by 125
<br />foot depth, commencing 104 feet SE from Elm Street, Thomas and Louise Tuite - Committee recommendation:
<br />Extension to May 20, 1957s to complete work required (construct driveway and repair sidwalks).
<br />Councilman Weiss stated that the property owner was not required to put inall new sidewalks. They
<br />are only being asked to put in a driveway and repair the. sidewalk. Mr. Tuite. spoke • on the question
<br />and protested the putting in of the driveway. This was followed by discussion after which Councilman
<br />Weymouth moved to accept the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried.
<br />t�
<br />Councilman Spillers voting No.
<br />Notice Numbers 324 and 325, dated February 1, 1957, Lots 3 and 49 Block 3, and Lot 5, Block 32 'r
<br />Subdivision A, Wellesley Park, Evelyn Hydenfeldt - Committee recommendation: Extension -to May 20,
<br />1957,. Councilman Weiss moved approval of, the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Councilman
<br />Stout and carried, Councilman Spillers voting NO.'
<br />Notice Number 330, dated February 1, 1957, easterly portion Lot 11, Block 3, Subdivision A, Wellesley
<br />Park, NEly 45.81 feet on Finger Avenue, Wm. H. and Gladys Leonheart - Committee recommendation:
<br />Extension to May 20, 1957, Councilman Weymouth moved approval of the Committee's recommendation,
<br />seconded by Councilman Granger and carried, Councilman Spillers voting NO.
<br />Notice Number 357, dated March 1, 1957, Lot 9, Block 22 Resub Blocks 1 and 2, Subdivision A,
<br />Wellesley Park, Martin E. Field - Committee recommendation: Extension to July 20, 1957, or
<br />completion of apartment building, whichever occurs first. Councilman Spillers moved approval of the
<br />Committee's recommendation, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. ;
<br />FURTHERCONSIDERATION PROPOSED ANNEXATION FARM HILLS ADDITION NO. 1. Councilman Spillers moved to continue
<br />this matter on the agenda for one week, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried.
<br />FURTHER CONSIDERATION R. G. HUNT APPLICATION FOR WATER CONNECTION AT 4160 JEFFERSON AVENUE. The Clerk
<br />iiread the letter from Mr. Howells Public Health Engineer, which reads in part as follows:
<br />"... The San Mateo County Department of Public Health and Welfare agrees that a hardship exists for
<br />Mr. Hunt, due to failure of his well, and would voice no objection should the Honorable City Council
<br />approve a water connection to serve the Hunt property.
<br />In order to assure that no furthercases develop in the future, the policy of the San Mateo
<br />County Department of Public Health and Welfare has now been changed. No further construction of
<br />homes will be permitted in the Emerald Lake area where wells are contemplated as the source of
<br />water for domestic purposes. Wells will be approved only for irrigation waters.'
<br />Councilman Spillers moved that the permit be granted, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried.
<br />
|