Laserfiche WebLink
453 <br />Councilman Stout moved that the letter be filed and the Department Heads take cognizance of the facts, <br />seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried. <br />ADOPT ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DOGS IN PARKS, ALSO PROHIBITING SALE OF FCWL AND ANIMALS IN PUBLIC PLACES. The <br />Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Councilman Spillers offered ORDINANCE 855 PROHIBITING ANY PERSON <br />HAVING CUSTODY OR CONTROL OF ANY DOG TO PERMIT SUCH DOG TO BE IN ANY PUBLIC PARK AND DECLARING ANY DOG <br />IN A PUBLIC PARK A PUBLIC NUISANCE: AND BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 7. 2 PROHIBITING THE DISTRIBUTION OF <br />FOWL AND OTHER ANIMALS ON THE STREETS OR PUBLIC PLACES IN THE CITY and moved its adoption, seconded by <br />Councilman Weymouth. Alfred Morton spoke on the subject of the dogs being brought to the park by people <br />in cars. They are not complaining about the dogs running loose. Mr. Tornell spoke on the matter and <br />recommended approval of the amendment to the dog ordinance. There was one letter protesting the amendment <br />to the ordinance from Margaret C. Miller. This was followed by discussion. The City Attorney stated that <br />he had been informed by the S. P. C. A. that this ordinance would be hard to enforee. This was followed <br />by discussion as to the way this ordinance could be enforced. The motion carried on roll call with <br />Councilman Granger voting NO. <br />L. C. THATCHER REQUEST CLOSE OUT SALE OF NURSERY STOCK, 32 LUCERNE STREET. The proper applications and deposit <br />had been turned in. Councilman Stout moved approval of the permit subject to the conditions of the ordinance, <br />seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />LETTER, ATTORNEY LEBSACK REGARDING PETITION FOR RE—HEARING, MC CAMMON VS. REDWOOD CITY TRUCK ROUTES. Councilman <br />Stout moved that this matter be referred to study meeting Wednesday evening, April 24th, seconded by <br />Councilman Weiss and carried. <br />TRAFFIC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED 4 1'VAY STOP AT VALOTA ROAD AND REDWOOD AVENUE. The Clerkxead the title of the <br />resolution. Councilman Stout offered RESOLUTION 2224 ESTABLISHING AND DECLARING THE INTERSECTION OF <br />VALOTA ROAD AND REDWOOD AVENUE TO BE A FOUR—WAY STOP INTERSECTION AND MOVED ITS ADOPTION, seconded by <br />Councilman Spillers and carried on roll calle <br />Councilman Spillers offered RESOLUTION 2225 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING FINAL MAP VALOTA MANOR SUBDIVISION SUBJECT <br />TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF <br />I&ROVEMENTS FOR SAID SUBDIVISION and moved its approval, seconded by Councilman Herkner. The conditions <br />were recommended by the -Planning Commission. The motion carried on roll call. <br />The Mayor called attention to the study meetings and noted a correction. The study meeting would be on <br />Wednesday, April 24th instead of Thursday, <br />Councilman Spillers brought up the matter of Spruce Street. He said that Mr. Dolwig did not receive a copy of <br />the resolution. The Clerk was asked to check the records and make sure the resolution was sent to <br />Sacramento. <br />Councilman Weiss brought up the matter of the abandonment of plan lines on E1 Camino Real and Whipple. He <br />stated that plans are being made to build on the corner property and he was of the opinion that the Council <br />should take this matter, under consideration before the work begins. This was followed by discussion. <br />Councilman Spillers wanted to know what has happended to the Streets and Highway Master Plan, Councilman <br />Spillers moved to have the City Manager check the matter of the Streets and Highway Master plan and report <br />back at the next Council meeting, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried. <br />Councilman Weiss read the following prepared statement: <br />Mr. Mayor and Gentlemen: I have here before me notes on some 75, more or less items that <br />have been brought before this council at stated meetings for action or consideration.. Approximately <br />35 or more of them.are now over three months old and have not as yet been resolved, nor have <br />progress reports been submitted recently to keep us abreast of their current status. <br />As an example — On January 14, Councilman Granger called for action on the sign ordinance, <br />at my suggestion his motion included that if the merchants committee failed to submit further <br />report, the council should proceed with consideration of the ordinance at an early February <br />meeting. It is now April and we have done nothing or hear any further reprots on the subject. <br />