Laserfiche WebLink
4P59 <br />could not consider super -markets in neighborhood areas. He spoke at some length on this subject. The <br />City Attorney stated that supermarkets would be under other zoning and would not be allowed in C -N zones. <br />The Mayor announced that a week from Wednesday the Council would hold a study meeting to answer questions <br />in regard to the changes of the zoning and they would have someone from the Planning Consultant's Office <br />to answer questions. The Mayor said that Mr. Giesch's remarks should be considered under item two of the <br />agenda and asked to Clerk to make note and record Mr. Giesch's remarks under item two of the agenda and <br />asked to Clerk to make note and record Mr. Giesoh's remarks under item two., proposed amendments to Zoning <br />Ordinance 600. <br />Mr. John Gillanders, 797 Castle Hill Road, spoke f or 275 property owners in the Farm Hills area. These <br />people objected to the rezoning in their area. They objected to the R -3-G zoning., Carleton Whitehead <br />spbke against the rezoning of Wayne Court and Friendly Acres. <br />Norman McKenzie, 825 Haven Avenue, stated that he had mailed a petition to the Council with 562 signatures <br />I <br />of the people in Friendly Acres objecting to the rezoning. They want the zoning left in R-2. They Mayor <br />asked the Clerk to make the petition a part of the record. Mr. L. T. Quarantes, representing the people <br />who voted against the rezoning on Union Avenue, addressed the Council and registered their .protest. Emil <br />Schlenker, 1043 - 16th Avenue, asked questions in regard to the sewers installed in 19h7 or 1949. Mr- Jain <br />k stated that the sewers were put in while Friendly Acres was still in the County- Walter Hohl, 919 Haven <br />Avenue, asked *hat would happen if the area were left in R-2 zoning- He wanted to know if the map would <br />be changed to R-2 or ii it would be left in R-1. <br />Clarence Fogel, 1484 Kentfield Avenue, spoke for the larger property owners approving the R -3-G and R-3 <br />zoning in the Kentfield-Palm area. The Clerk read a letter from Richard Delucchi requesting R-2 zoning in <br />Friendly Acres. Mr- Vernon Roberts, 1631 Union Avenue, spoke in favor of R -3-G zoning in his area. <br />N Councilman Weiss read the following prepared statement: <br />till� Under date of April 8th at the first public hearing on this question it was officially <br />voted to continue the hearing to this date with the understanding that at least a couplefof <br />study meetings would be held in the mean time. <br />Unfortunately the study meetings on this question have not been held. I have however <br />continued my study and the views,I have previously expressed at our meeting of April 8, have <br />in effect been fortified by the additional information that has been made available to us <br />since that date. ° <br />I ,As a resume I wish to go on record that the land use plan as presently proposed in <br />unrealistic and needs considerable revision to make it so and to bring it in line or to have <br />it conform to a satisfactory degree with waht the our planning consultant has indicated as <br />being the ideal for a community of 80,000 people. <br />Amongst the many adjustments that may be necessary, here are just a few: <br />1. We should revise the proposed allocations of acreage and areas to the various uses, <br />so as to more reasonably conform to the ideal indicated for 80,000. We must realize that <br />imbalances ranging from 30 to 200 per cent are not at all realistic. <br />2. We should endeavor to eliminate ultimately the checker board pattern for various types <br />r <br />of -areas and zonings. <br />3. We should, whenever practicable, so arrange boundaries of various areas that they <br />�! shall conform to street patterns rather than back or side lot lines. <br />4. Carefully study suitable zonings of areas in the hilly sections already within city <br />limits'as well as potential annexation area. (R-1 with stipulation of 10,000 or more square <br />foot per dwelling unit. - Rural type of development and street improvement, with provisions <br />for adequate arterial or other access roads.). <br />It is my belief that any study meetings before taking final action on this matter, should <br />'cbe held jointly with the Planning commission, the planning consultant, and of course the <br />�1 city mangger and the city engineer. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that the public hearing be continued to May 20th, seconded by Councilman Weymouth <br />and carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED TWELVE AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE 600. The affidavit of publication was ordered <br />filed. The Mayor asked that Mr. Giesch's remarks be made a part of this hearing. Clarence Ross, 3024 <br />McGarvey Street, objected to the R -3-G zoning. Councilman Spillers moved that this public hearing be <br />