My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
42 <br />services, because -we are now dealing with people,not uninhabited and unimproved. land. <br />The 400 additional houses contemplated would mean 1,000 or more persons. This certainly <br />means additional taxing of our present facilities paid for or being paid for by the <br />present residents. The improved streets also mean run-off of water, which heretofore <br />soaked into the ground adding to our flooding dangers. <br />The Farm Hills Subdivision is only referred to as an example as it is the most recent <br />subdivision coming into the city. The example could be applied to any other area where <br />one, ten, fifty or a large group of homes are to be built, making like demands on our <br />facilities. The physical condition of the property should be taken into account to <br />determine if all the services will be taxed. <br />In conclusion any fee charged probably should be placed in a separate account for u N <br />capital improvements and probably proportionately earmarked as is done in some cities. <br />It is apparent that uninhabited land may lay within the city in its natural state so an, <br />annexation fee should then be charged against potential subdivision or later when it is <br />subdivided. <br />The City of Tracy recently passed an ordinance for the collection of subdivision taxes. <br />The ordinance dated September 22, 1955, was specifically for 'fCapital Outlay Fund". <br />It is an amendment to an,existing ordinance and in part reads as follows: <br />Is <br />Section 4.12 (A) As a condition precedent to the approval of the Final" <br />.Map, each subdivider shall first deposit with the City the sum of Fifty <br />Dollars ($50.00) for each lot delineated on such Final Map, such sum to <br />be deposited in a fund to be known as the Capital Outlay Recreational Fund. <br />(B) Where more than one dwelling unit per lot is erected <br />or planned in any subdivision, then for each such additional dwelling unit <br />an additional fee of Fifty Dollars (;50.00) shall be paid to a maximum of <br />One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) per lot. <br />(D) On and after the effective date of this Ordinance <br />there shall be payable to the City the sums as provided by Section 4.12, <br />sub -sections (A), (B) and (C) of this Ordinance for each such unit building <br />permit issued in Subdivision projects that have been approved by the City <br />subsequent to January 1, 1955• <br />Perhaps a similar ordinance such as adopted by the City of Tracy encompassing all <br />service referred to above be enacted for Redwood City. <br />Councilman Stout moved that the City Manager be requested to determine and recommend to the Council a <br />fair figure for subdivision and or annexation charges and prepare a formula for appropriate earmarking <br />to be applied toward Capital Improvements and such recommendation and report to be presented to the <br />Council in two weeks. Councilman Britschgi stated this was a very good report but at the study meeting <br />they took this matter up and they were waiting for a report from the subdividers which will be turned <br />in by the 18th of January. Any action taken by the Council at this time will not help the situation <br />any. Councilman Royer asked that since the Council is negotiating with the people they should wait for <br />the report. Councilman Stout's motion lost for lack of a second. <br />Councilman Royer moved that they wait for the report on the 18th, seconded by Councilman Britschgi, <br />Councilman Stout's report to be accepted and the information utilized. Councilman Stout stated that he <br />had some pamphlets from the League of California Cities and did the Council grant him to hold up this <br />informationbefore mailing it back to the League. Mr. Weiss spoke in regard to this matter and he was of <br />the opinion that the public should be made aware of any action. Motion carried. <br />City Engineer Jain stated that they 11ad investigated the problem of Cordilleras Creek and found that the <br />problem of the flood did not occur at the bend at Industrial Way as had been anticipated. He reported <br />that three years ago his department wanted to raise the banks but the people in the area would not move <br />their fences so the banks could be -raised. They found that the flood occurred on the School property <br />where the creek -is blocked by 20 to 30 tree trunks* Mr. Jain asked that the Council request the School <br />to clean the creek and widen the channel. Councilman Britschgi moved that the School be contacted to <br />clean up the creek, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />City Clerk stated that the Exchange Club wanted permission to put up a ticket booth on Broadway to sell <br />dance tickets for a dance to be held in the American Legion building for the benefit of High School <br />students. Councilman Spillers moved permission be granted, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. <br />Councilman Britschgi asked Col. Louis Weiss if he was the editor of the newspaper his organization put out. <br />Col. Weiss stated that he was one of the assistants. Councilman Britschgi stated that as a member of <br />R <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.