Laserfiche WebLink
480 <br />Mr. Ross, 3024 McGarvey Street, wanted to know if this included the lots on Farm Hills Boulevard in <br />Farm Hills Addition No, 1, Mr. Frahm stated that this is already in Redwood City. The motion carried. <br />Councilman Herkner offered RESOLUTION 2243 FINDING AND <br />THAT PROTEST TO THE PROPOSED <br />,ANNEXATION TO THE,CITY OF REDWOOD CITY OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED FARM HILL ADDT.TION <br />,NO. 1 HAS NOT BEEN MADE BY OWNERS OF ONE-HALF OF THE VALUE OF SUCH TERRITORY AS SHOUN BY THE LAST <br />EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL, NOR,BY PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OWNERS EQUAL TO ONE-HALF OF THE VALUE OF SUCH iLL <br />TERRITORY AS DETERMINED BY SAID.CGUNGIL and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Oranger and <br />carried on roll call, Councilman Weiss voting No and Councilman Spillers being noted absent. <br />Councilman herkner offered RESOLUTION 2244 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AND <br />ODDSTAD HOMES IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO CITY OF REDWOOD.CITY DESIGNATED <br />FARM HILL ADDITION NO. 1 and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Weymouth, Councilman Weiss <br />read a prepared statement which reads in part as follows: "Postponement of payment of the annexation <br />fee would be a bad preceddnt and can many times in the future cause this Council considerable embarrass- <br />ment .... We must not overlook or forget that this type of indebtedness .... cannot be made a lien against <br />the property and I do not believe that payment at a later date could be enforced even in the event of <br />default .... The Council cannot or should not enter into any agreement or take.any action that could <br />result in the loss of specific revenues to the City .... the result of such action would be that for all <br />purposes and intents we would be loaning the City's money to private corporations or individuals for <br />their personal benefit and gain. I certainly believe that such action would be highly irregular, if <br />not illegal, and certainly I cannot be a party to any such agreement." The City Attorney stated that <br />this was not illegal., Councilman Weiss asked if this indebtedness could be enforced as a lien against <br />the property. The City Attorney stated it was not a lien against the property. Councilman Weiss <br />asked what their rights were to enforce the indebtedness at a later date. The City Attorney stated <br />that as he had previously informed the Council there is some question about the enforcability of the <br />agreement but stated that as a practical matter the Council had practical control of the situation <br />since it governs the filing of subdivisionnmaps in the.area. Councilman Stout spoke on the subject <br />and stated that since other cities had an annexation fee ordinance that he believed that the City <br />could also have one. He .was of the opinion that this could be establishinga precedent. This was <br />followed by discussion. The Mayor stated that the Council did not agree to waive the annexation fee. <br />This was followed by discussion. The annexation fee will be paid before the map is recorded. The <br />M <br />motion carried on roll call with Councilman Weiss voting No and Councilman Spillers being noted absent. <br />Councilman Weymouth offered introduction of an ordinance of the City of Redwood City approving the <br />annexation to the City of Redwood City of certain uninhabited territory designated "Farm Hill Addition <br />No. 1" and herein described, and herein annexing said territory to said City of Redwood City, seconded <br />by Councilman Stout and carried, Councilman Weiss voting NO. <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT AND RECOI&ENDATION ON ST. VINCENT DE PAUL REQUEST FOR EXEMPT LICENSE TO OPERATE THRIFT <br />SHOP. The Clerk read the letter from the City Manager in which he stated that he ohecked with the City <br />Collector and has been informed that similar organizations are now operating under our local business <br />ordinance with no apparent hardhsip or complaint. In fairness to these two organizations, and in I <br />order to be consistent, it would seem difficult to make an exception in this particular. case. The <br />City Manager recommended that they charge the license fee and require the necessary bond. Councilman <br />Weymouth stated that he only raised the question of the required bond. Councilman Granger moved to <br />accept the recommendation of the City Manager, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried. <br />THATCHER NURSERY REQUEST THIRDY DAY EXTENSION, CLOSE OUT SALE (Section 4, Ordinance 437, $15.00 fee attached). <br />The City Attorney stated that this application was in order. Councilman Stout moved approval of the <br />0 <br />