My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
J <br />1 <br />X77 <br />Councilman Weymouth suggested that consideration be given to waiving the bonds on this type of business <br />and to set a•smaller license fee. Councilman Weymouth moved to refer this matter to the City Manager <br />for a recommendation, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. <br />The City Attorney reported that he had an ordinance ready for introduction in regard to the transferring and <br />appropriating the sum of $11,250 from the unbudgeted reserve of the General Fund to certain stated <br />departments purposes; appropriating the sum of $293.38 from the Capital Project Fund to Capital <br />Improvements to the Training Building, Community Park; and appropriating the am of $13,000 from the <br />Yacht Harbor Improvement Fund, and $1,937.23 from the 1944 Bond Fund for Capital Improvements to <br />Yacht Harbor. <br />Councilman Weiss offered introduction of the ordinance, striking out the last two sections of the <br />ordinance in regard to the appropriations for the Yacht Harbor, seconded by Councilman Stout. Council- <br />man Herkner, as chairman of the Yacht Harbor Committee, did not approve the deletion to the ordinance. <br />This was followed by discussion. Councilman Spillers made an amendment to the motion to adopt the <br />ordinance in whole. This was followed•by discussion and it was decided' to vote on the original motion. <br />There wasn't any second to Councilman Spillers motion. The City Attorney discussed the matter and then <br />Councilman Stout withdrew his second to Councilman Weiss's motion. <br />Councilman Spillers moved to intorduce the ordinance as prepared by the City Attorney, seconded by <br />Councilman Weymouth and carried, Councilman Weiss voting NO. <br />Councilman Spillers offered RESOLUTION 2241 APPROVING CHANGE ORDERS IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRU6TION OF <br />REDWOOD CITY POLICE STATION and moved its adoption4 seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried on roll <br />call, Councilman Granger being noted absent. <br />CONTINUATION CITY OF SAN CARLOS REGARDING PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, <br />'MAP OF EATON AVENUE <br />VILLAS, Councilman Stout moved that this matter be referred back to the City Manager and he advise the <br />people of the letter received from the City of San Carlos (the people in the area and the property <br />owner), seconded by Councilman Herkner. Councilman Spillers stated that the people in the area lived <br />on one-half acre lots and they objected to Mr. Toffanelli's property being allowed to annex to San <br />Carlos because they are afraid the lots will be split into smaller lots than are allowed in Redwood <br />City. <br />Mr. Toffanelli addressed the Council and stated that he has had the property for the past eleven years <br />and he has -not been able to buil& on it because he could not get sewers. This was followed by <br />discussion with the Mayor telling Mr. Toffanelli what the Council had discussed at the study meeting <br />in regard to the size of the lots which the people in the area were concerned about. There was also <br />discussion in regard to the'possibility of deed restrictions and subdivision of the lots, the <br />possibility of receiving sewers from San Carlos with the understanding of a gentlemen's agreement that <br />the property would be allowed to annex to San Carlos after the subdivision map and deed restrictions <br />were approved by the Redwood City Council. <br />If Mr. Toffanelli were allowed to annex to San Carlos before the subdivision map was recorded, he would <br />be allowed to resubdivide his lots into three lots with 8,000 sq. ft. each and five lots with 5,000 sq. <br />ft. each. Redwood City has a limit of 6,000 sq. ft* per each lot. This was followed by discussion in <br />regard to the possibility of allowing a nine lot compromise and leaving the matter to the Planning <br />Commission for recommendation. The nine lots was the suggestion of Councilman Spillers in order to <br />protect the people in the area. Councilman Herkner withdrew his second to the original motion. <br />Councilman Weiss moved to refer the matter to the Planning Commission with a copy of the minutes to be <br />referred to them also, seconded by Councilman Stout. After some discussion the motion was withdrawn <br />and then put back into motion. The City Attorney reminded the Council of the street assessment bonds <br />which have to be paid off before the de -annexation would be allowed. The Mayor stated that this was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.