Laserfiche WebLink
494 <br />Councilman Spillers appeared in the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Councilman Stout seconded the <br />motion which carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANNING C014MISSIONIS RECOMMENDATION TO DENY APPLICATION OF J. E. CRAWFORD <br />(140 Roosevelt Avenue) TO REZONE PORTION OF LOT 43 BLOCK B, W. W. & M. SUBDIVISION, <br />FROM R-4 TO C -1-H. The Planning Commission refused to recommend approval of the <br />extension of a C-1 Zone, particularly in view of the statements made by the applicant <br />that he only wished to reduce required setback for an apartment development. There <br />being no -,:protests, written or oral, Councilman Stout moved that the public hearing be <br />closed, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried. <br />Councilman Stout moved that the Planning Commission recommendation be approved to deny <br />the rezoning, seconded by Councilman Weiss. This was followed by discussion in regard <br />to the location of the property. The motion carried with Councilman Spillers voting N0. <br />COUNCILMAN HERKNER REPORT REGARDING GARBAGE CONTRACT. Councilman Herkner stated that the <br />Committee met again with the San Mateo County Garbage Company representatives to go over <br />the suggested agreement referring to a new proposed ordinance. A few changes were <br />suggested and the rates are subject to arbitration at the start of each fiscal year. <br />The contract is now being drawn up by the City Attorney who is meeting with the Garbage <br />Companyts representatives. Councilman Spillers moved that this mat -ter be referred to <br />the City Attorney and the Committee's report be accepted, seconded by Councilman Granger. <br />Councilman Weiss moved an' amendment to the motion that a draft of the contract be given <br />to the Council before it is signed. The Mayor asked if this could be made a part of the <br />motion rather than an amendment. This was agreed to by Councilman Weiss and the maker <br />of the motion. The motion carried. <br />CITY MANAGER ORAL REPORT ON THE TRAFFIC SURVEY. The City Manager stated that the Traffic <br />aurvey is now before the Planning Commission for a study meeting. They will set the <br />matter for a public hearing after which it will be presented to the Council at the same <br />time that the Land Use Plan is to be turned over to the Council. <br />REPORT ON BID OPENING, STREET RESURFACING. The following bids were received: <br />Name <br />Bragato Paving Co. <br />Sondgroth Bros. <br />Freeman Paving Co. <br />L. C. Smith Co. <br />Douglass & Woodhouse <br />S. L. Vistica & Son <br />Engineers Estir to <br />Alternate No. 1 <br />Daytime Work on <br />all Streets. <br />$14,814.52 <br />15,067.35 <br />14,017.61 <br />17,481.68 <br />18,353.02 <br />18,386.50 <br />18,872.00 <br />Alternate No. 2 <br />Night or Sunday Work on <br />Broadway, Daytime work <br />on all other streets. <br />015360-30 <br />15,828.35 <br />16,778.61 <br />18,775.38 <br />19,045.53 <br />19,413.85 <br />19,633.00 <br />The City Engineer recommended that the low bid of Bragato Paving Co. be accepted, <br />Alternate No. 2, for paving Broadway during night time or Sunday hours, and all other <br />streets during regular daytime hours. This was concurred in by the City Manager. <br />Councilman Granger moved approval of the City Engineer's recommendation to accept the low <br />bid of Bragato Paving Co. and rejected all other bids, seconded by Councilman Spillers. <br />Councilman Herkner stated that he was of the opinion that the work should be done during <br />daytime rather than at night when it is too dark to do the work without proper lighting <br />equipment. He preferred having the work done on Sunday rather than having the work done' <br />at night time. This was followed by considerable discussion as to when would be the best <br />time for everyohe to have the work done, Sunday or night time for Broadway. The Police <br />Chief and the City Engineer preferred having the work done on Sunday if it was possible. <br />u� <br />F <br />