My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 27_1957-06-17 to 1960-07-25
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1957 to 1960 Book 27
>
BOOK 27_1957-06-17 to 1960-07-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:40:24 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:36:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/17/1957
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�1 <br />have been brought before the Council at this time. Councilman Weiss was of the <br />opinion that his suggestions should be given to the Planning Commission for considera- <br />tion in regard to the Industrial Way extension. This was followed by discussion. <br />a Councilman Stout seconded the motion. This was followed by discussion in regard to <br />overpasses at 5 Points and Whipple Avenue. Councilman Granger suggested that the <br />;1 <br />City Manager call a meeting and discuss this with the Commissions and also get the <br />I' <br />thinking of the Southern Pacific Company and then make a report back to the Council. <br />I <br />The Mayor asked that the Department Heads and City Manager give consideration to <br />the thinking of Councilman Granger. This was followed by discussion. Councilman <br />Weiss stated that Hopkins Avenue was a City problem and not a State problem. The <br />City Manager was of the opinion that this should be made a part of the Street and <br />Highway Plan. Councilman Weymouth stated that he thought that this should be g iven <br />to the Traffic Committee first before any other commission or Department Head goes <br />into the matter. If the traffic problem is suc.L that this is not feasible there is <br />no sense in the others going into the matter. This was followed by discussion. The <br />motion carried. <br />The Mayor asked for a study meeting on the budget for Wednesday, July 10!th,.and bring the <br />matter before the Council two weeks from tonight, July.15th. This was followed by <br />discussion. Councilman Weiss suggested that the Council adopt the budget at this <br />time and then at a later date they could change the budget if it becomes necessary. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that the preliminary budget, as studied by the Council, be <br />approved. This was followed by discussion in regard to the addition of personnel <br />and the difficulty this might have in the procedure of adopting or changing the <br />budget. The City Manager stated that he would prefer that the Council wait for two <br />weeks to give the Council a chance to give the budget a complete study. Councilman <br />Weiss withdrew his motion since it was the recommendation of the City Manager. The <br />Mayor asked that this be set for a study meeting on July 10th. The Mayor also <br />asked that the Council give consideration to a study meeting to discuss the problem of <br />Spruce Street financing on July 17th. <br />TRAFFIC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED AMENDING ORDINANCE 758 TO INCLUDE TWO SECTIONS REQUIRED BY <br />STATE FOR INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. The Committee recommended that <br />Ordinance 758 be amended to include the following paragraphs: <br />1. "Any provision of this ordinance which regulates tnaffie or delegates the <br />regulation of traffic upon State Highways in any way for which the approval of the <br />Department of Public Works is required by law, shall cease to be operative six <br />months after receipt by the City Council of written notice of withdrawal of approval <br />of the Department of Public Works. Immediately upon the effective date of such re- <br />vocation, the City Clerk shall enter upon the original copy of this ordinance a <br />notification of such withdrawal." <br />2. "Whenever this ordinance delegates authority to a city officer, or authorizes <br />action by the City Council to regulate traffic upon a State highway in any way which <br />by law requires the prior approval of the Department of Public Works, no such <br />officer shall exercise such authority nor shall such action by the City Council be <br />effective with respect to any State highway without prior approval in writing of the <br />Department of Public Works when and to the extent required by Division 9 and Division <br />11 of the V"'hicle Code." <br />The City Attorney concurred in the recommendation. Councilman Weymouth moved that <br />they adopt the Traffic Committee's recommendation and refer this to the City -Attorney <br />for the necessary amendment to the ordinance, seconded by Councilman Weiss and <br />carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.