Res04 PC-04-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. a procedure for notifying City Building Division staff and Police Department; . a plan for posting signs onsite pertaining to permitted construction days and hours and complaint procedures, who to notify in the event of a problem; and a listing of telephone numbers to call (during regular construction hours and off-hours); . designation of a construction complaint manager for the Project; and . posting of notices to notify neighbors within three hundred (300) feet of the Project construction area at least thirty (30) days in advance of pile-driving activities about the nature and estimated duration of the activity. Mitigation Measure F.2c: If pile driving will be conducted during hours outside those specified in Mitigation Measure F.1a, in addition to Mitigation Measures F.1b, F.2a, and F.2b, the Project applicant shall implement the following measures to reduce the impact of pile driving noise on nearby sensitive receptors: . The Project applicant shall erect temporary plywood barriers along the southwest boundary of the Project site, between the site and sensitive receptors to attenuate noise from pile driving; . The Project applicant shall hire a third party acoustical consultant to recommend additional mitigation measures to reduce pile driving noise based on site and Project- specific factors; . The Project applicant shall retain a third party to conduct noise monitoring at sensitive receptors over the duration of the pile driving activity in order to ensure that noise levels from the Project site do not exceed ambient noise levels. Finding F.2: Alternative methods of pile-driving may not be feasible due to the physical constraints of the soil, adjacent to the Bay, and the economic costs of any possible alternative. Furthermore, even if pile-driving is completed more quickly by increasing the hours during which pile-driving takes place, the short term noise effects will still be considered significant and unavoidable. Overriding Consideration F.2: The environmental, economic, social and other benefits of the Project override the significant impact described above, as more fully stated in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section 2 of the Resolution. c. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Impact L.1: The Project would increase demand for water in Redwood City. (Potentially Significant) 3 U:\ProjectslAbbott Labs\Planning Commission - EIR and Entitlements\Statement of Overriding ConsiderationslAbbott - Statement of Overriding Considertions.doc