Laserfiche WebLink
CITY MANAGER REPORTS <br />4. Mobil Food Vendors (707 -06) <br />Report: Police Chief 8/1/87 <br />In response to questions, Police Chief Guardino said that complaints about <br />mobil food vendors, known as taco trucks, are related to gatherings around <br />the parked vehicles, litter, rumored illegal activities, traffic and safety <br />hazards, and violations of the Health and Safety Code. <br />In further response to questions, Chief Guardino said that the penalty for <br />violation of the proposed ordinance is a mandatory court appearance with the <br />taco truck operator required to appear in person before the Traffic <br />Commission with no bail permitted; that the proposed ordinance is more <br />stringent than that of the County; that the County is considering making <br />their ordinance more restrictive; that the appropriate fine for the <br />infraction will be determined at the Commission hearing; and that his <br />department would commit whatever resources are necessary to enforce the <br />proposed ordinance. <br />Senior Assistant City Attorney Case and Chief Guardino replied that if a taco <br />truck operator attempted to make an agreement to allow the truck to stand on <br />private property, then the operator would be subject to the Health and Safety <br />Code, Zoning Ordinance, Building Code and all other legal requirements <br />pertaining to any other stationary restaurant operation. <br />Jesse Monroy, 1796 Broadway, said that he represents the taco truck operators <br />and asked to speak last. <br />Myrna - - - - -- Newark, representing Concerned Merchants, favored regulation of <br />the taco trucks. <br />Fernando Veqa, 321 Spring Street, reported that he represents a group of <br />businessmen in the Middlefield Road area who are negatively affected by the <br />taco trucks and inquired regarding interpretations of the proposed ordinance. <br />Mr. Vega suggested an environmental impact report should be required for <br />each vehicle and stated that Middlefield Road is congested by traffic; the <br />vendors should not be permitted to operate 16 hours daily; they create safety <br />hazards on sidewalks and at corners; they generate litter which must be <br />cleaned up by others; he fears permits may be granted only for the East <br />Redwood City area; and that the taco trucks contribute to a ghetto -like <br />atmosphere there. Mr. Vega said that he opposes the ordinance because it is <br />not sufficiently restrictive. <br />Jesse Monroy, (see above) suggested the proposed ordinance violates the right <br />of free enterprise of the taco truck operators and reported that three in <br />Redwood City have received citations amounting to more than $7,000 during the <br />past two months for a variety of violations of the law. Mr. Monroy said the <br />proposed ordinance offers too many restrictions; the vendors need more than <br />30 minutes standing time; they would like designated places where they may <br />stand indefinitely; they wish to operate 16 hours daily; that requiring the <br />Reg.Mtg. <br />8/24/87 <br />Page 5 MINUTE BOOK NO. 47 <br />Page No. 340 <br />