CC Min 1986-05-19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Item No. 2 (continued) improvements, and did not believe that developers should expect the District to accept responsibility for private improvements. Mr. Warren then distributed copies to Council of his letter dated May 19, 1986, which suggested some revisions to the development agreement. City Attorney Schricker advised in reply to question by Council that the draft agreement before it is the same one approved by the Planning Commission, but that some changes will be incorporated based on the action taken on the previous agenda item relating to the Planned Development Permit. Robert Slusser,541 Kringle Drive, stated that the development agreement before Council is basically a continuation of one developed several years ago when the City commissioned a study to determine alternative funding methods for public improvements in GID 1 -64. An advisory committee was established at that time on which he served, to make refinements and recommendations regarding funding methods, and resulting in the first development agreement with Redwood Shores, Inc., which established the policy that all in -tract improvements in the District were the responsibility of the property owner, and the District would fund only those public improvements that were out of tract public improvements. Each subsequent developer was required to come before Council with its separate development agreement. He expressed concern that a fire protection fee provision in the agreement might be setting a precedent. In continued discussion by Council, it was determined that the development agreement did not include the points recommended by Redwood Shores, Inc., because the Planning Commission had made the decision not to do so. Mike Gibson, representing Redwood Shores, Inc., commented on the fact that increased traffic will impact not only Ralston Interchange, but Holly Street as well; that the higher volume caused by the new development will result in diversion of traffic onto interior Redwood Shores streets. Paul Bailey, 202 Shorebird Circle, supported the comments of Mr. Gibson, and expressed concern regarding increased use of residential streets for parking resulting from the development. Mayor Claire invited anyone else present who wished to speak to do so. No one wished to speak. M /S: Stangel /Greenalch to close the public hearing. Carried unanimously by voice vote and public hearing closed at 9:40 p.m. M /S: LaBerge/ to include in the development agreement the modification requested by Redwood Shores, Inc. to Paragraph 10 to insert after "Ralston /U.S. 101 Interchange" the words "Holly /U.S. 101 Interchange, Redwood Shores Parkway, Twin Dolphin Drive ". Motion died for lack of a second. Title read. M /S: Britschgi /Chandler Reg.Mtg. MINUTE BOOK NO. 46 5/19/86 Page No. 268 Page 5