AgdaPkt 2002-05-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

with Mr. Farahyar and his architect just prior to the Public Hearing while I stood outside and waited. I assume that Mr. Farahyar paid the normal fee to the City of Redwood City for this private consultation with the Zoning Administrator. Any recommendation coming from this Public Hearing. will be based on false representation, and potentially fraudulent claims by Mr. Farahyar. 2. The Town of Woodside has determined the minimum requirements for the road improvemems associated with 747 Southview Way for an enchroachment permit and to meet county guidelines. All of the residents of Southview Way that I have spoken with support this requirement. I had agreed to present this te the town of Woodside orJy if it was modified to match the requests of the Town of Woodside and the County of San Marco guidelines, including street width and fire hydrant requirements. Mr. Farahyar decided to ignore this, and he fraudulently presented a request of Public Works Matching Fund to the Town of Woodside in my name and the names of Woodside residents. Mr. Farahyar's application to receive $20,000 of public money by such a fraudulent means is a very serious action and indicative of many other aspects of this project. Mr. Farahya.r agreed to run a water line down Southview way in his application to Woodside. In summary, Mr. Farahyar and his architect fraudulently misrespresented myself and the residents of Southview Way in order to get matching funds from Woodside in order to pay for paving Southview Way. Mr. Farahyar and his architect then applied for approval for his project by submitting that the road paving condition will be met. However, they have gone so far as altering the terms of that fraudulent agreement to save cost when they submitted it to the Redwood City, ignoring the requirement for the water line extension and fire hydrant, which are required for the encroachment permit by the Town of Woodside. The Plan submitted at the Public Hearing did not meet the requirements of the enchroachment permit including wa water line extension in the street and a fire hydrant. This duplicitous action by Mr. Farahyar and the fraudulent submission to receive city funds needs to be investigated. 3. Mr. Farahyar had agreed to place a fire hydrant in the road to meet the minimum requirements of the county and of the Town of Woodside and for f~re safety. He had previously put this in writing and presented it to the residents of Southview Way and to the Town of Woodside. He also agreed to run a water line down the street of Southview Way for safety. The Town of Woodside has insisted on this as part of the road improvement program. Mr. Farahyar has given me and the town of Woodside a written document agreeing to place the fire hydrant in the road as a condition of the road improvement. Count3, regulation requires a fire hydrant in the street within 500 feet of any new development. Two of us have spoken to Steve Mitchum, Dept. of Public Works - Water Department about water service and have been told in no uncertain terms that the fire hydrant must be in the road and the service line must be in the street and can not be placed in an easement because of safety, and maintenance. At the Public Hearing of March 20, 2002 these basic requirements for safety, all previously agreed to by Mr. Farahyar were promptly ignored. The Zoning