Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> � g, ��- � d <br /> Essentially, you have two options. They are: <br /> • Continue to pursue a private reimbursement agrcement from as many property <br /> owners as possible to help pay for most of the EIR, technical repurts, and street <br /> improvements. Clearly, the City Council believed that the developer should pay for <br /> most of the work, with a small contribution by the City. Understandably, it may be <br /> difficult to convince all the property owners to contribute given the varied interests <br /> and the amount of money needed. Yet, it would be to your benefit to show as much • <br /> effort as possible. <br /> • Another option would be to prepare and submit to Community Development Services <br /> a detailed anatysis of your proposal, including site plan, property locations, <br /> description proposal, and the written endorsement of interested property owners. <br /> (You also might want to consider a larger contribution si�ce your amount plus the <br /> City's 18% contribution will certainly not be enough to cover the costs of the EIR and <br /> technical reports). Staff will then review your proposal, prepare a cover <br /> memorandum, and send it to the City Council. If the City Council after reviewing <br /> your proposal wants to re-examine the policy, then staffwill schedule the item for a <br /> public hearing. If the policy does change, then the EIR and project would still have to <br /> go through the normal planning process and numerous public hearings by the <br /> Planning Commission and Planning staff: <br /> Sincerely, <br /> /S/ <br /> Tom Passanisi <br /> Pri�cipal Planner <br /> C: Deborah Nelson <br /> Michael Church <br /> Chazles Csicsman . <br />