Laserfiche WebLink
B.A�-II <br /> ATTACHMENT 1B <br /> SCOT W. S WEENEY <br /> l 7915 Old Barn Lane � � <br /> Salinas, CA 93907-8546 <br /> September 28, 2004 <br /> Planning Services <br /> �� <br /> City of Redwood City <br /> Attn: Jill Dever Ekas, AICP �� <br /> 1017 Middlefield Road � - <br /> Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> Dear Jill, <br /> Re: 3730 Lauret Way <br /> I'm writing this letter to seek an entitlement to build on my lot located at 3730 Lawel <br /> Way. Lot 3730 is on the "paved " section of Laurel Way as you will see from the <br /> pictures enclosed, and is adjacent to the left ofthe Aozasa residence that was built in <br /> 1998. I put up 6` tall "pink" stakes to indicate the boundary lines of the lot, which you <br /> can see in most of the pictures. The lot has 66 feet of paved street frontage. I've aLso <br /> enclosed a parcel map from 1996 which indicates that I am on the paved roadway. <br /> Granting an entitlement to build on my lot would be consistent with current City Council <br /> Policy, specificatly Resolution #1411 (Dec. 2000) RESTATING POLICY REGARDING <br /> DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY ON LAUREL <br /> WAY IN THE CITY OF REDW�OD CITY. <br /> "The 1988 Policy did not distinguish between parcels of real properry fronting on that <br /> portion of Laurel Way which has been paved, but not improved to City's standards. <br /> Application for entitlements to develop properties fronting on Laurel Way subsequent to <br /> 1988 has indicated a need to make such a distinction. The parcels of real propertv <br /> Jronting on said ' paved " portion of Laurel Way do not reguire, for development, the <br /> construction of water, and sewer lines, nor do they require the construction of retaining <br /> walls pursuunt to the Improvement Plans ". <br /> Cunent City Council Policy states: "Properties located on Laurel Way fronting on the <br /> westerly and northerly unpaved extension thereof (the "Ajfected Area') are, from the <br /> standpoint of development, distinguishable from those parcels fronting on the paved <br /> portion because such development and improvement of Laurel Way would require <br /> extensive grading and the construction of retaining walls pursuant 10 the Improvement <br /> Plans; further, water and sewer utilities are not currently crvailable to said properties ". <br /> My lot at 3730 is on the said "paved" Fortion of Laurel Way and does not require for <br />