My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2005-03-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2005
>
AgdaPkt 2005-03-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:53:55 PM
Creation date
3/10/2005 4:10:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
3/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. - �- .-. <br /> �,�-1�7 <br /> Page 2 October 12, 2004 <br /> because such development arrd improvement of Laurel R'ay would require eztensive <br /> grading and the construction of retaining walls pursuant to the Improvement <br /> Plans; further, water arul sewer utilities are not currently available to said <br /> properties. " <br /> My lot at 3730 fronts on the said paved portion of Laurel Way, and does not require for <br /> development the construction of water and sewer lines, nor does it require extensive <br /> grading and the construction of retaining walls pursuant to the Improvement Plans. In <br /> addition, I have a properly designed, constructed and approved storm water drainage <br /> system on my property (see pictures) that was signed off by John Lynch in engineering, <br /> that further distinguishes my property from (the "Affected Area'�. I've enclosed pictures, <br /> drainage agreement, and as-built drawings for your review. <br /> I've met with staff members Tom Passanisi and Jill Ekas to discuss this, and their response <br /> was that they went by the staff report and not the Resolution when drawing the Exhibit <br /> "A". It is this behavior that explains the discrepancy. It was my contention that the <br /> Resolution is Policy and would take precedent over the staff report? Staff would not <br /> acknowledge the Resolution, even Paragraph "1" as I read it before them in their office. <br /> Tom Passanisi did not even acknowledge a 1996 Parcel Map which he gave me 8 years <br /> ago (enclosed) showing the paved section and dirt road. <br /> I've spoken with Vice Mayor Barbara Pierce and Forn�er Mayor and Council Member Jim <br /> Hartnett for guidance, henceforth this letter. I'd 11ce to resolve this, and would appreciate <br /> it if you can look into this and get back to me in the next couple of weeks, hopefully . <br /> before the next October 25th Council Meeting. I will be happy to speak in front of the <br /> Council if neces.sary. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (650) <br /> 430-4131. <br /> , Sincerely, <br /> .�i <br /> / � ,,' <br /> � ���Gct-C.Eit�..(ti <br /> Scott Sweeney � <br /> Enclosures: <br /> Resolution #14111, 1996 Parcel Map, drainage agreement, as-built drawings, tot pictures, <br /> and storm drain pictures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.